Converting torque to electricity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of converting torque generated by a solar tracking device, which utilizes phase change of paraffin wax, into electricity. Participants explore the potential for using the torque produced to drive a generator, considering the limitations of the device's rotational speed and power output.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the practicality of using the torque generated (3,000 ft lbs) to produce electricity due to the slow rotation (only 90 degrees per day).
  • One participant suggests that while the torque is significant, the actual power output may be low, prompting a suggestion to conduct a weight-lifting test to measure average power.
  • Another participant provides a calculation for power output based on force, distance, and time, estimating it to be very small (0.0003 HP), while acknowledging uncertainty due to illness.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between power output and the mass lifted, with a formula provided for calculating power based on mass, height, and time.
  • One participant calculates a horsepower value of 0.16, comparing it to the output of solar panels and suggesting that multiple devices would be needed to match a single panel's output.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of a heliostat and suggests looking into existing projects for insights on power requirements and gear reduction schemes.
  • Concerns are raised about the additional power needed to rotate panels in high wind conditions, suggesting design considerations for reliability.
  • A participant points out a potential error in a previous calculation regarding horsepower, suggesting a need for dimensional analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the feasibility and efficiency of converting the generated torque into electricity. There is no consensus on the power output or the practicality of the proposed approach, with multiple competing views remaining throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include uncertainty in calculations, assumptions about the system's efficiency, and the dependence on specific design choices for the solar tracking device and generator setup.

Jeffb47
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
We have a solar tracking device that uses phase change of paraffin wax when heated inside a solar receiver. With a helical slot in a torque tube we can translate the expansion into rotational motion. We use this rotation to point solar panels at the sun, thus generating more electricity. Look us up at << Link removed by Moderator >>

We have a unit that generates 3,000+ ft lbs of torque. Strong, but only one slow rotation per day. Could this torque be used to directly generate electricity?? How much would we need to make this drive a generator?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Probably not as good as the solar panels... it may produce a lot of torque but how much power?
Demount a solar panel, attach a pulley, see if you can get it to lift a weight.
You could, in principle, gear one up to rotate a generator shaft quite fast...
I suppose ##P=\tau\omega##, at a constant speed.
 
Thanks Simon..We've done the weight test, that's actually how we tested the device before connecting it to solar panels.
Question remains whether at 3,000 ft lbs rotating essentially only 90 degrees per day whether it would even be possible to gear it up to created the speed (and torque) that a generator requires.
 
Power = force X distance / time. Let's assume the "driving arm" is exactly one foot long. The available force is 3,000 pounds. The distance is (twice the radius times pi / 4) (because of 90 degree rotation). So the distance is (2 X pi)/4 or 1.57 feet. Let's assume this happens during daylight hours, say 8 hours. The work is the force times the distance. Divide by seconds and you get a horsepower value. It's pretty small, 0.0003 HP. You should check my numbers, I have the flu and I'm not thinking 100% clearly. Note that you get exactly the same power regardless of the length of the "driving arm"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jeffb47, Merlin3189 and Simon Bridge
What he said: though if you've done the weight-lift test then you have a measure of the average available power ... it is P=mgh/t ... the mass lifted, how high you lifted it, and how long that took, and the gravity factor.
When you run a generator offof it, you cannot get more power than that.

If a generator with that capability is worth it to you is another story.
Gearing up will add load due to the nature of gears... which is outside my capabilities sorry.
 
Good stuff. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the horsepower would be (3,000x1.57)/(8*60*60)=0.16. Still pretty small. So I read on a generator website that 2hp can generate 1kW of electricity. So, 0.25hp would generate 250W or about the same an one solar panel. So at 0.16, we'll need 2 (rounding up) of our devices to generate the same electricity as 1 solar panel. Solar panels cost about $300. No way (yet) we can build 2 of our devices + the generator for that.
Thanks for your thoughts!
 
You are asking about a heliostat. Look up Arduino or Rasberry PI heliostat projects. I'm sure you'll find lots of them, and the discussions may include power requirements, and gear reduction schemes. You may also be able to post your question on forums where heliostat hobbyists hang out.

A roller bearing on the panel mount would help reduce rotation power needs a lot.

By the way, don't forget wind when estimating the power required. It may take a lot more energy to rotate the panels on high wind days. If your device is to be reliable 365 days/year, then it must be designed for the worst case day. It may also be smart to design it to "feather" the panels (rotate them to near zero wind resistance position) if winds exceed design.
 
Jeffb47, you forgot to divide by 550 to get horsepower. Do a dimensional analysis on your units and you'll see where your error is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K