Switching between parallel and series connections (solar)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing solar panel connections for an off-grid system located at 57 degrees north, where prolonged cloudy conditions hinder solar energy production. The user has experimented with a small solar charge controller that performs better during cloudy days compared to a larger main controller, despite its lower capacity. The user seeks a solution to automate switching between parallel and series connections of solar panels to maximize efficiency without risking damage from relay failures. Suggestions include using MOSFETs for switching instead of relays, due to their reliability and lower power consumption.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solar charge controllers, specifically MPPT (Maximum Power Point Tracking) technology.
  • Knowledge of electrical circuits, particularly series and parallel configurations.
  • Familiarity with relay and MOSFET operation in DC circuits.
  • Basic principles of power consumption and efficiency in solar energy systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implementation of MOSFETs for DC switching applications in solar systems.
  • Explore advanced MPPT solar charge controllers that can handle high voltage and low power consumption.
  • Investigate feedback mechanisms for relay circuits to prevent reverse voltage issues.
  • Learn about short-circuiting techniques to safely switch DC current sources in solar arrays.
USEFUL FOR

Solar energy enthusiasts, off-grid homeowners, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in optimizing solar panel performance under varying weather conditions.

  • #31
Baluncore said:
I would consider scrounging the high voltage electrolytic capacitors and diodes out of old switching computer power supplies.
I would recommend using Non-Inductive, Metallized FIlm capacitors rather than old Electrolytics.

Electrolytics fail with age by drying out, especially at elevated temperatures. They also have poor high frequency response, which they will see during switching transients.

Metal FIlm do not have that aging problem, they self-heal if they develop an internal short circuit, and the non-inductive ones have decent high frequency response to suppress the switching transients.

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Tom.G said:
I would recommend using Non-Inductive, Metallized FIlm capacitors rather than old Electrolytics.
This is not running above 10 kHz in a switching supply. It may only be needed a couple of times each day.
The snubber does not need fast capacitors, it needs to ramp up voltage while current ramps down, and so prevent sparks. There is plenty of time and voltage headroom during the transient.
An electrolytic has distributed inductance and capacitance, a bit like a transmission line. If the inductance of the electrolytic was high, a parallel 10 nF ceramic could be connected in parallel, but that is what the first turn of foil in an electrolytic actually does.

Tom.G said:
Electrolytics fail with age by drying out, especially at elevated temperatures.
The capacitors in this snubber idle with no ripple current, so they will run cold.

I am advocating a cheap experimental solution that will work OK and do the job, rather than an expensive overkill on a military budget. Gold plating the electrodes and polishing electrons is not needed either.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
805
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
548
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
11K