Correct statement about movement of curve ball in a fluid

  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
songoku
Messages
2,479
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
In a curve ball, the movement of air can be shown below. For each statement, check whether it is true or false
(i) Upward force will act on the ball
(ii) If the rotation of the ball is reversed, then the force acting on the ball is also reversed.
(iii) In the picture, as it rotates, the ball is also moving to the left
(iv) The air below the ball is moving faster than the air above the ball
Relevant Equations
Not sure
1760190077617.webp

(i) Not really sure about this statement but my answer is TRUE because from the picture the air layers on the bottom part of the ball are closer so it means there is force from the ball to push the layers to be closer. Since the ball gives downward force to the air, by Newton's 3rd law, the air will exert upward force on the ball

(ii) I would say this statement is FALSE. Even though the rotation is reversed, there is possibility that the bottom air layers are squeezed closer so direction of force is not reversed.

(iii) Can we determine the direction of movement of the ball from the picture? I mean maybe the ball can move upward, downward, left, right

(iv) This statement is TRUE because at the bottom part the direction of air flow and rotation of the ball is the same while at the top they have opposite direction so at the top part of the ball, the rotation of the ball will obstruct the air movement, causing it to move slower


Are my answers correct and how to determine the direction of movement of the ball?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
songoku said:
(i) Not really sure about this statement but my answer is TRUE because from the picture the air layers on the bottom part of the ball are closer so it means there is force from the ball to push the layers to be closer. Since the ball gives downward force to the air, by Newton's 3rd law, the air will exert upward force on the ball
Yes, and the reasoning you give is ok. I would have described it as the flow lines are compressed below so the air pressure is greater.
songoku said:
(ii) I would say this statement is FALSE. Even though the rotation is reversed, there is possibility that the bottom air layers are squeezed closer so direction of force is not reversed.
Surely the flow lines are as they are because of the ball's rotation.
To see the effect of opposite spin, just flip the picture upside down.
songoku said:
(iii) Can we determine the direction of movement of the ball from the picture? I mean maybe the ball can move upward, downward, left, right
I think you are supposed to assume the ball has been pitched at a speed rather greater than the wind speed.
songoku said:
(iv) This statement is TRUE because at the bottom part the direction of air flow and rotation of the ball is the same while at the top they have opposite direction so at the top part of the ball, the rotation of the ball will obstruct the air movement, causing it to move slower
Another argument I've seen used is to consider how far the air has to move in the two paths, but I think yours is ok.
 
haruspex said:
Surely the flow lines are as they are because of the ball's rotation.
To see the effect of opposite spin, just flip the picture upside down.
I see, so statement (ii) is TRUE

haruspex said:
I think you are supposed to assume the ball has been pitched at a speed rather greater than the wind speed.
Sorry I don't understand this. Do you mean the ball is moving against the wind so it is moving to the right?

haruspex said:
Another argument I've seen used is to consider how far the air has to move in the two paths, but I think yours is ok.
What do you mean by "how far the air has to move in the two paths"?

Thanks
 
I have a feeling I have misled you on statement 1. From experience, there should be downward pressure on the ball. And if the air is moving faster under the ball the pressure must be lower there.
songoku said:
I see, so statement (ii) is TRUE
Yes.
songoku said:
Sorry I don't understand this. Do you mean the ball is moving against the wind so it is moving to the right?
I mean the ball is moving sufficiently fast that you can ignore the wind and treat the air as still.
songoku said:
What do you mean by "how far the air has to move in the two paths"?
That the lower stream has further to go around the ball to rejoin the upper stream. Why does it need to rejoin its original neighbours in the upper stream? The ball is not very wide. There needs to be some continuity with the lateral neighbouring air masses.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top