Correct! Thank you for catching that mistake.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a woman pushing a 38kg box on a horizontal surface with a force directed at an angle below the horizontal. The scenario includes kinetic friction and requires calculating the net work done on the box after it has traveled a specific distance, given its initial speed and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss two methods for calculating work: one involving force components and friction, and another using kinetic energy changes. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of negative work and the relevance of different forces acting on the box.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to determine the net work done on the box. Some participants suggest focusing on horizontal forces and the net work, while others clarify the distinction between work done by the pusher and net work on the box. Various interpretations of the equations and assumptions are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the application of work formulas, the role of acceleration, and the significance of different components of force. There is also mention of the initial conditions and the need for clarity on the calculations involved.

dyel
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A woman pushes a 38kg box on a horizontal floor with a force F⃗ that is directed 30° below the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the floor and the box is 0.53. If the initial speed of the box is 7.89m/s and the box accelerates at 1.63m/s^2 , what is the net work done on the box by all forces acting on it after it has traveled a distance of 2.51m ?
The answer provided is 155.47J.

Homework Equations


F=ma?
Fk = ukN
W= fdcos(x)
W= fd
W= Kf - Ki

The Attempt at a Solution


Method 1:
F=ma
Fcos(30) - Fk = 38 (1.63)
Fcos(30) - 0.53N= 38 (1.63)

Finding the Normal Force:
N-mg-Fsin(30) =0
N =38 (9.81) + Fsin(30)

Subbing N back into the equation

Fcos(30) - 0.53[38 (9.81) + Fsin(30)]= 38 (1.63)
F = 38(1.63) + 0.53(9.81)(38) / cos(30) - 0.53sin(30)

Work: Fcos(30) x 2.51 = 1541.18J

Method 2:

W= Kf - Ki
= 0.5(38)(54.07) - 0.5(38)(62.25)
= -155.47J

Can somebody tell me why I got the wrong answer using the first method, yet when I use the second method I get the answer with a minus sign (which indicates negative work?) ?

If that is the case, then shouldn't the answer then be -155.47J?

Thank You!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi dyel, Welcome to PF !:smile:
dyel said:

Homework Statement


A woman pushes a 38kg box on a horizontal floor with a force F⃗ that is directed 30° below the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the floor and the box is 0.53. If the initial speed of the box is 7.89m/s and the box accelerates at 1.63m/s^2 , what is the net work done on the box by all forces acting on it after it has traveled a distance of 2.51m ?
The answer provided is 155.47J.

Homework Equations


F=ma?
Fk = ukN
W= fdcos(x)
W= fd ( It is wrong )
W= Kf - Ki ( No need here)

The Attempt at a Solution


Method 1:
F=ma
Fcos(30) - Fk = 38 (1.63)
This much is enough.
You need the net work done.
You already have the force value in horizontal direction.
What is the distance. Find the horizontal work done.
What is the force in upward direction?
 
dyel said:
Method 1:
F=ma
Fcos(30) - Fk = 38 (1.63)
Fcos(30) - 0.53N= 38 (1.63)
This way is going to calculate the work done by the pusher. This is not the same as the net work done on the box.
dyel said:
Method 2:

W= Kf - Ki
= 0.5(38)(54.07) - 0.5(38)(62.25)
How do you get 54.07?
 
haruspex said:
This way is going to calculate the work done by the pusher. This is not the same as the net work done on the box.

How do you get 54.07?

Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2as
 
Raghav Gupta said:
Hi dyel, Welcome to PF !:smile:

This much is enough.
You need the net work done.
You already have the force value in horizontal direction.
What is the distance. Find the horizontal work done.
What is the force in upward direction?

Why is W = fd wrong? I interpret the work on the box done by the mass multiplied by net acceleration and the distance traveled.
 
putongren said:
Why is W = fd wrong? I interpret the work on the box done by the mass multiplied by net acceleration and the distance traveled.
W = fdcosθ
Note θ = 0° for forward horizontal motion taking horizontal force component and it is 90° for vertical force component.
 
What if there is no "net acceleration" as is the case here?
 
Raghav Gupta said:
W = fdcosθ
Note θ = 0° for forward horizontal motion taking horizontal force component and it is 90° for vertical force component.

I got it. Looked up Wikipedia as well. You take the dot product of F ds, which is F d cos θ.
 
Work is the dot product of two vector quantities, a force vector and a displacement vector. Because of this, work is always a scalar and therefore has magnitude and no direction. So whenever you calculate work done using the dot product of your force vector and your displacement vector, you want to use absolute value bars.

You're given a lot of information, most of which you don't need. You're given your displacement, your mass and your acceleration. The horizontal component of the force being applied by the woman is found with one very simple calculation, because the acceleration we're given is the box's horizontal acceleration (the box does not go up or down, therefore there is no vertical component of acceleration as all the vertical components of force are balanced). We don't need to care about the friction force because we're already given the horizontal acceleration.

Armed with this knowledge, we now know that we have a horizontal displacement (2.51m), the mass of the box (38kg) and the constant acceleration of the box (1.63m/s^2).
We know that F = ma, and we know that work is the dot product of the force vector and the displacement vector. What about the angle, though? The dot product always multiplies the magnitudes of the vectors by the cosine of some angle theta.

In this case, we have all the horizontal components we need. Therefore, theta is 0, and the cosine of 0 is 1. Thus

W = ||F|| ||d|| = ||ma|| ||d||

W = ||(38kg)(1.63m/s^2)|| ||2.51m||

W = 155.4694kgm^2/s^2 = 155.4694N*m = 155.4694J

W = 155.47J

And voila, there's our answer!

As you can see, physics is all about understanding the concepts and applying these concepts to a problem. If we can understand a problem, most of the time a solution will easily present itself. Instead of jumping straight into calculations, I thought about concepts I've learned, saw where I can apply these to this particular problem, and only then started to solve. Physics is the art of thinking, and mathematics is simply a tool with which we can describe our thoughts in an applicable way.

Best of luck in the future!
 
  • #10
dyel said:
Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2as
The initial speed is nearly 8m/s, and the acceleration is positive, so I don't see how that formula will give you a value less than 60 for vf2. Did you subtract instead of adding?
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
The initial speed is nearly 8m/s, and the acceleration is positive, so I don't see how that formula will give you a value less than 60 for vf2. Did you subtract instead of adding?

Vf^2 =Vi^2 + 2as
= 7.89^2 + 2(1.63) (2.51)
= 54.06
Vf = 7.35 m/s
 
  • #12
dyel said:
= 7.89^2 + 2(1.63) (2.51)
= 54.06
7.89^2 + 2(1.63) (2.51)=70.4347
How can the speed go down from 7.89 to 7.35 while accelerating at +1.63?

7.89^2 - 2(1.63) (2.51)=54.07
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
7.89^2 + 2(1.63) (2.51)=70.4347
How can the speed go down from 7.89 to 7.35 while accelerating at +1.63?

7.89^2 - 2(1.63) (2.51)=54.07
I messed up on my end. Opps
 
  • #14
dyel said:
I messed up on my end. Opps
So now you should get the right sign on the work as well as the right magnitude, yes?