Correcting a Typo in d'Inverno's Lagrangian on Page 172 | Section 11.3 Results

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nrqed
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses a typographical error in d'Inverno's Lagrangian on page 172, specifically regarding the sign of the Lambda term. The correct Lagrangian should reflect the variation results from section 11.3, where the equations for the variation with respect to \( g^{ab} \) indicate a sign discrepancy. The equations show that the Lagrangian as presented does not yield the expected results due to the incorrect sign of the Lambda term, which should be negative. This correction is crucial for accurate theoretical predictions in the context of general relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts, particularly Lagrangian mechanics.
  • Familiarity with the Einstein-Hilbert action and its variations.
  • Knowledge of tensor calculus, specifically variations with respect to metric tensors.
  • Proficiency in interpreting mathematical notation used in theoretical physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Einstein-Hilbert action and its derivation in general relativity.
  • Study the process of variation in the context of Lagrangian mechanics.
  • Examine the implications of sign changes in Lagrangians on physical predictions.
  • Explore advanced topics in tensor calculus relevant to general relativity.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on general relativity and Lagrangian formulations. It provides insights into the importance of precision in mathematical formulations within theoretical frameworks.

nrqed
Science Advisor
Messages
3,762
Reaction score
297
On page 172 he writes


[tex]G_{ab} - \Lambda g_{ab} = 8 \pi T_{ab}~~~(13.5)[/tex]

Using the results of section 11.3..the corresponding Lagrangian is

[tex]{\cal L} = \sqrt{-g} (R - 2 \Lambda) + {\cal L}_M[/tex]



But the sign of the Lambda term in the Lagrangian is wrong, it seems to me.


In section 11.3 he shows that

[tex]\frac{\delta (R \sqrt{-g})}{\delta g_{ab}} = - \sqrt{-g} G^{ab}[/tex]

and


[tex]\frac{\delta ( \sqrt{-g})}{\delta g_{ab}} = \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{-g} g^{ab}[/tex]



However, the signs are switched in both equations if we do the variation with respect to [tex]g^{ab}[/tex]:

[tex]\frac{\delta (R \sqrt{-g})}{\delta g^{ab}} = + \sqrt{-g} G_{ab}[/tex]

and


[tex]\frac{\delta ( \sqrt{-g})}{\delta g^{ab}} = - \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{-g} g_{ab}[/tex]


So the Lagrangian he wrote does not lead to the equation he gave because the Lambda term will acquire a minus sign.


Can someone tell me if I am missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
962
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K