MHB Correlation of Two Random Vectors

OhMyMarkov
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

I'm coming to notice day by day how our education is purely focused on memorizing and applying formulas rather than understanding the concept. Assume we have the following:

$X = aR + N$, and
$Y = bG + W$,

where $X, Y$ are random vectors, $R, G$ are strongly correlated random vector that average out to the zero vector each, $a, b$ are scalars, and $N, W$ are two independent vectors of i.i.d. normal RVs.

Now, $X$ and $Y$ are correlated, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OhMyMarkov said:
Hello everyone!

I'm coming to notice day by day how our education is purely focused on memorizing and applying formulas rather than understanding the concept. Assume we have the following:

$X = aR + N$, and
$Y = bG + W$,

where $X, Y$ are random vectors, $R, G$ are strongly correlated random vector that average out to the zero vector each, $a, b$ are scalars, and $N, W$ are two independent vectors of i.i.d. normal RVs.

Now, $X$ and $Y$ are correlated, right?

I somehow suspect you have missed out some information, but under my interpretation of what you mean, yes.

If you write out what you mean by correlation it should be obvious what the answer is.

CB

PS My interpretation of what you mean when you ask are X and Y correlated is that you are asking: is \( E( (X-\overline{X}) (Y-\overline{Y})^t)\ne {\bf{0}} \)?
 
Last edited:
Yes, this is what I mean. Wanted to make sure... I'll review the problem...
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top