Correspondence Theorem for Groups .... Rotman, Propn 1.82 ....

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Theorem
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading the book: "Advanced Modern Algebra" (Second Edition) by Joseph J. Rotman ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 1: Groups I ...

I need help with an aspect of the proof of Proposition 1.82 (Correspondence Theorem) ...

Proposition 1.82 reads as follows:
Rotman - 1 - Proposition 1.82 ... .png

Rotman - 2 - Proposition 1.82 ... .PART 2 .png

In the above proof by Rotman we read the following:

" ... ... For the reverse inclusion let ##a \in \pi^{-1} \pi (S)##, so that ##\pi (a) = \pi (s)## for some ##s \in S##. It follows that ##as^{-1} \in \text{ ker } \pi = K## ... ... "Can someone please explain exactly how/why ##\pi (a) = \pi (s)## implies that ##as^{-1} \in \text{ ker } \pi = K## ... ...?Peter

===========================================================================================***EDIT***

Just had some thoughts ... BUT ... unfortunately my logic does not seem to line up with Rotman's logic ...

My thoughts are as follows:

##\pi (a) = \pi (s)##

##\Longrightarrow aK = sK##

##\Longrightarrow a = sk## for some ##k \in K## since ##a## must belong to ##sK## ... ... (is this a legitimate step ...)

##\Longrightarrow s^{-1} a = k##

##\Longrightarrow as^{-1} = k##

##\Longrightarrow as^{-1} \in \text{ker } \pi = K##Is that correct?

BUT note ... logic is different from Rotman's set of steps ... ... what is Rotman's logic ...?Peter
 

Attachments

  • Rotman - 1 - Proposition 1.82 ... .png
    Rotman - 1 - Proposition 1.82 ... .png
    47.7 KB · Views: 512
  • Rotman - 2 - Proposition 1.82 ... .PART 2 .png
    Rotman - 2 - Proposition 1.82 ... .PART 2 .png
    13.6 KB · Views: 431
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
##\operatorname{ker}\pi = \{a \in G\,\vert \,\pi(a)=[e] \in G/K\}## and ##[e] \in G/K## is the coset ##e\cdot K##. Important is that ##\pi## is a group homomorphism:
$$
\pi(a)=\pi(s) \Longrightarrow \pi(a)\cdot \pi(s)^{-1}=\pi(as^{-1})=[e] \in G/K \Longrightarrow as^{-1}\in \operatorname{ker}\pi
$$
by definition of the kernel. Now which elements of ##G## map to ##G/K \ni [e]= e\cdot K\,##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
Hi fresh_42 ... thanks for the help ...

Which elements map to ##e_{G/K} = e_{G} K## ... ?

I think it is all the elements of the normal group ##K## ... Is that correct?

Peter
 
Math Amateur said:
Hi fresh_42 ... thanks for the help ...

Which elements map to ##e_{G/K} = e_{G} K## ... ?

I think it is all the elements of the normal group ##K## ... Is that correct?

Peter
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
The canonical map ##\pi## is a homomorphism (easy exercise). Hence, ##\pi(a) = \pi(s) \implies \pi(as^{-1}) = \pi(a)\pi(s)^{-1} = e \implies as^{-1} \in \ker \pi##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
Thanks Math_QED ... most helpful and clear ..

Peter
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K