Cosmology & Physics Books: Recommended Reads

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for books on cosmology and modern physics, particularly aimed at non-science students. Participants share their experiences with various texts and suggest additional readings, considering both popular science books and more technical resources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in further reading after enjoying Michael Greene's works and seeks recommendations.
  • Another participant questions the mathematical background of the original poster, implying that the level of math knowledge may influence book recommendations.
  • A participant argues that popular science books may not provide substantial educational value and suggests university-level textbooks for serious study.
  • Warren recommends "Gravity from the Ground Up" by Bernard Schutz, noting its accessibility for those with limited math background.
  • A suggestion is made to explore Steven Weinberg's "The First Three Minutes," highlighting its accuracy without heavy reliance on formulas.
  • Another participant shares a link to a book by Edward Harrison, mentioning it includes some elementary calculus.
  • One participant mentions their own website with cosmology articles and reading lists, indicating a personal contribution to the topic.
  • A participant values pedagogical approaches to complex subjects, suggesting that popular science books can engage younger audiences before they delve deeper into the mathematics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to learning cosmology, with some advocating for popular science books while others emphasize the importance of more rigorous academic texts. The discussion reflects differing opinions on the value of various types of literature in understanding cosmology.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the appropriate level of mathematical background required for different books, and there are varying opinions on the educational value of popular science literature versus academic texts.

student007
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am a non-science student with a huge interest in cosmology and modern physics. I've read Micheal Greene's "Elegant Universe" and "Fabric of the Cosmos" a couple of times, and I loved them. What else do you recommend? (I know about Stephen Hawking's 2 books, and I hope to read them sometime soon). Anyone else have any suggestions?
 
Space news on Phys.org
How much math can you handle?
 
The paperback novel-type books really aren't going to teach you much. At most, they're going to be good entertainment. If you really want to study cosmology, you should look into university-level textbooks on the subject.

- Warren
 
Last edited:
Gravity from the Ground Up by Bernard Schutz. I have just flipped through the book, and I think it was written mainly for people whose strong point is not differential geometry but who have not forgotten their high-school non-calculus maths. Of course, cosmology forms only a part of the book, general relativity being the main theme.
 
Take look to the threads in the subforum Book Reviews, in Career & Academic Guidance. A very interesting book, without formulas but very accurate, is Steven Weinberg's "The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe".
 
Last edited:
I've written some cosmology related articles on my website, and have made lists of suggested reading to accompany them. These can be found at Stretchy space and Cosmological Horizons
 
I like pedagogical treatments of extraordinarily difficult subjects, like cosmology. I agree you have to learn a great deal of math to grasp the deep issues, but, the popular press is a great way to capture the attention of kids who will someday take it to the next level.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K