Could All Matter Be Curved Space Itself?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of whether matter could be understood as curved space itself, rather than as entities that curve space. This includes exploring the implications of this idea for particles, forces, and the nature of phenomena in physics, touching on theoretical perspectives and analogies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that matter could be viewed as curved space, proposing that all particles and forces might be distortions in space itself.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the idea, noting that while it is possible, mainstream science does not support this view.
  • A different viewpoint argues that in string theory, particles of normal matter are distinct from those associated with gravity, casting doubt on the idea that matter is simply curved space.
  • One participant acknowledges the notion of matter as condensed space but points out that it raises more questions, particularly regarding the explanation of gravity.
  • A later reply provides a technical correction, explaining that curvature can exist in spacetime without matter, referencing the Riemann Tensor and its relationship to gravitational fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some supporting the idea of matter as curved space and others challenging its validity. There is no consensus on the topic, and multiple competing perspectives remain.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes technical aspects related to the Riemann Tensor and gravitational fields, which may not be fully resolved or understood by all participants. The relationship between curvature and matter is a complex topic that is not definitively settled in the conversation.

CosmicVoyager
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
Greetings,

I read a lot. It is often repetitious. Occasionally I read an idea or way of looking at something that I had not read before.

In one book, I read the matter did not curve space, but rather, matter *is* curved space. This is a paradigm shift in the way of thinking about matter.

Could it be that all particles and forces are not in space, but are rather curves, twists, or distortions in space itself? So that all there is is space?

Could all phenomena be different kinds of geometry interacting in different ways?

Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
Is it possible? Maybe. No one can say for sure yet. I know there are several theories I've heard of that say something kind of like this, but as far as I know mainstream science does not support this.
 
Even in string theory, the particles that make up normal matter are rather distinct from the particles that make up gravity (curved space). So I doubt that this idea holds much water, except perhaps as an analogy.
 
Matter as a form of condensed space makes sense, but, raises more questions than it solves. Foremost, it does a terrible job explaining gravity.
 
CosmicVoyager said:
Greetings,

I read a lot. It is often repetitious. Occasionally I read an idea or way of looking at something that I had not read before.

In one book, I read the matter did not curve space, but rather, matter *is* curved space. This is a paradigm shift in the way of thinking about matter.

Could it be that all particles and forces are not in space, but are rather curves, twists, or distortions in space itself? So that all there is is space?

Could all phenomena be different kinds of geometry interacting in different ways?

Thanks

The viewpoint you express is a very good viewpoint, and has a name "geometrodynamics".

There is a technical error though in what you said. A region of spacetime can have curvature without there being matter. Matter is not curvature. The curvature is something called the Riemann Tensor. Matter is is stuff that is (sort of) sums of components of the Riemann Tensor. You can have a nonb-zero Riemann Curvature Tensor where the relevants sum is zero, and thus you can have curvature in spacetime where there is no matter.

The following approximate description should explain the situation in a concrete way. The curvature tensor is much like first derivatives of the gravitational field--sort of like tidal forces. Since the Earth produces an (approx) inverse squared gravitational force, the radial derivatives go as the inverse of the radius cubed. Thus in the vacuum region around the Earth there is a curvature that goes as (r)^(-3). So there is curvature in the vacuum. The mass goes as the SUM of the derivative in the x direction of the x component of the gravitational field plus the derivative in the y direction of the y component of the gravitational field plus the derivative in the z direction of the z component of the gravitational field--*this* quantity corresponds to the Newtonian del squared phi (where phi is the gravitational potential) and vanishes in the vacuum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K