Could bosonic strings be a kind of projective space of m-theory?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between bosonic strings and M-theory, specifically exploring the idea of projecting bosonic strings into tachyons and the implications of compactifying dimensions. Participants examine theoretical frameworks, dimensionality, and the potential for geometric explanations of fermions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that projecting bosonic strings could lead to the emergence of tachyons, drawing an analogy to superluminal motion.
  • There is a suggestion that compactifications on a projective space could bridge bosonic string theory and M-theory.
  • One participant questions the validity of compactifying 15 of the 26 dimensions of bosonic string theory to derive M-theory, arguing that it implies bosonic string theory is more fundamental.
  • Another participant raises the need to explain the relationship between supersymmetry (SUSY) and the two theories, particularly why M-theory incorporates SUSY while bosonic string theory does not.
  • A later reply discusses the possibility of explaining fermions geometrically rather than as fields on the worldsheet, referencing historical attempts to connect these ideas.
  • There is mention of a specific mathematical framework involving fiber bundles and self-dual lattices that could potentially relate to gauge symmetries in string theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between bosonic string theory and M-theory, with no consensus on the validity of compactification methods or the implications for fundamental theory.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight unresolved questions regarding the nature of tachyons, the role of SUSY, and the effectiveness of previous theoretical attempts to connect bosonic strings and M-theory.

MTd2
Gold Member
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
25
Just like you can create the ilusion of superluminal motion by projecting a flashlight into a wall, some strings would be projected into tachyons. Has anyone heard or thought about that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How would this work?

The theories live in different space-time dimensions.
 
BenTheMan said:
The theories live in different space-time dimensions.

That's why I am saying projections. Hmm, I guess it would be better if I say compactifications on some kind of projective space.
 
Ahh I see.

So you want to compactify 15 of the 26 dimensions of bosonic string theory and get M theory?
 
I think that would not be good, though because it would say that bosonic string theory is more fundamental that Mtheory, which we know is probably not true.

I'd be willing to bet it doesn't work. You'd have to explain why Mtheory knows about SUSY and bosonic string theory doesn't. You'd have to explain what happens to the tachyon (it could get projected out, but who knows?).
 
Quite the contrary. Susy is another motivation, that's why I am said m-theory. Do you know any case of getting non commutative spinors from the compactification of bosonic fields?
 
Why is SUSY a motivation?
 
I'd like to see if it is possible to explain the fermions by geometric means, instead of just being a field on the worldsheet.
 
BenTheMan said:
So you want to compactify 15 of the 26 dimensions of bosonic string theory and get M theory?

Or better yet, fiber a 16-dimensional projective space over an 11-dimensional M-theory base.

arXiv: 0909.4737
 
  • #10
MTd2 said:
I'd like to see if it is possible to explain the fermions by geometric means, instead of just being a field on the worldsheet.

Yep, that goes under the name "spin from isospin" and can lead to spin 1/2 modes in monopole backgrounds. That goes back to work of Jackiw and Rebbi in the 70s.

And there was even an attempt to make use of this in the bosonic string, back in the eigthies, by Englert, Nicolai & Co. The aim was to get the heterotic string rather than M-Theory. This makes much more sense, not only because M-Theory is a strong coupling limit without world-sheet formulation. The point is that 26-10=16, which would allow to obtain the E8xE8 or SO(32) gauge symmetries by compactification on an 16 dimensional self-dual lattice.

But all attempts, AFAIK, never got further then purely kinematical or group theoretical reasonings. I remember that there was some revived interest in this more recently, but again, I don't think anything concrete ever got out from that idea - so far.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K