Could deforestation lead to potential pandemics?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disease
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential link between deforestation and the emergence of pandemics, particularly focusing on whether old trees in rainforests can harbor diseases that are released into the environment when cut down or burned. Participants explore various aspects of this claim, including the mechanisms by which diseases might spread following deforestation and the implications for human health.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that old trees may harbor diseases that could be released into the environment when the trees are cut down, potentially leading to pandemics.
  • Others argue that deforestation creates new pathways for existing diseases to spread, such as by breeding mosquitoes that carry malaria, rather than releasing new diseases.
  • A participant questions the validity of the claim that burning trees could release pathogens, noting that high temperatures are likely to kill pathogens.
  • There is speculation about whether viruses or bacteria could be stored in trees for long periods or if certain trees could concentrate disease agents, increasing human exposure when the trees are cut.
  • One participant states that, to their knowledge, no unknown diseases harmful to humans have been discovered living on or in trees.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between deforestation and disease emergence, with no consensus reached on whether old trees can harbor and release pathogens or if existing diseases are simply spread through new environmental conditions created by deforestation.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on assumptions about the behavior of pathogens in relation to trees and the effects of deforestation, which remain unresolved. The discussion also highlights the complexity of disease transmission dynamics in altered environments.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying environmental science, epidemiology, or ecology, as well as individuals concerned with the impacts of deforestation on public health.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
There has long been a claim that old trees [hundreds of years old] commonly found in rainforests can harbor diseases that are released into the local environment when the trees are cut and burned. Humans are then exposed to these agents thus creating the potential for pandemics.

Is there any truth in this claim?

[Wasn't sure if this was best suited for biology, medical sciences, or Earth sciences]
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
Its not so much that new diseases are being set free, as it is normal diseases have a new road to travel on. These large areas of clear cut swatches leave ponds and puddles for Misquotes to breed, and can bring massive clouds of Malaria infested bugs into new areas.

And of course, once humans bring their diseases into the openings, they can spread like wild fire, with natives who have no natural immune to them.
 
I've never heard the claim. It seems a little odd, especially in the case of burning, since high temperatures would be more likely to kill an pathogens.

Perhaps people not indiginous to the area contract illnesses readily when they enter to clear the land simply because they don't have prior exposure to the local pathogens, and that is the source of the rumor? It's about the only thing that would fit the scenario that I could think of off the top of my head.

Edit: Seems hypatia beat me to it. :biggrin:
 
oooh, oooh, I can use this little tidbit on old trees that I watched the other day. This tree is estimated to be 2,700 years old.

The Grizzly Giant is not only old--"grizzly"--but it is also enormous--a "giant." The tree is 100 feet around at the base with a diameter of 29 feet (sometimes quotes as 31), and is 209 feet high, although it presently has a snag top and once was much higher. It is the largest tree in Yosemite and is believed to be the 5th largest tree on earth, weighing an astounding 2 million pounds and comprising 30,000 cubic feet of lumber, enough to build some 20 homes. Its lowest limbs are 6 feet across.

http://www.shannontech.com/ParkVision/Yosemite/Yosemite11.html
 
Moonbear said:
It seems a little odd, especially in the case of burning, since high temperatures would be more likely to kill an pathogens.

Well, to be fair, just the process of cutting the trees down spreads large amounts of material that never gets burned.

Would it be possible for viruses or bacteria to be stored in a tree for a long period of time? Or, could it be possible that certain trees can concentrate these agents, say by acting as a breeding ground, so that the normal levels of exposure by humans is vastly increased when the trees are cut?

I realize that there are secondary reasons why disease would follow deforestation, but I was curious about the particular claim that the trees themselves can store and release disease causing agents.
 
Last edited:
As far as I know, no one has ever discovered a unknown disease living on or in a tree, that could harm a human.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
17K
Replies
5
Views
4K