Could Dinosaurs Have Evolved Higher Intelligence If They Survived Extinction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gold Barz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intelligence
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for dinosaurs to have evolved higher intelligence had they survived the extinction events. Participants explore various aspects of intelligence, evolutionary processes, and the implications of social structures among dinosaurs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that dinosaurs might have had the potential for increased intelligence, possibly leading to an intelligence arms race.
  • Others question the definition of intelligence and whether dinosaurs could have achieved sentience, suggesting that evidence for such claims is lacking.
  • There is a discussion about whether the dinosaur body plan was conducive to evolving higher intelligence, with some arguing that energy management systems would need to improve.
  • Some participants mention fossil evidence indicating an increase in encephalization quotients among dinosaurs, while others express skepticism about the significance of this trend.
  • There are differing views on whether birds evolved from dinosaurs or if both descended from a common ancestor, with implications for understanding intelligence evolution.
  • Some argue that the evolution of intelligence would need to be beneficial for dinosaurs, questioning the necessity of sentience for their survival and social functioning.
  • Participants discuss the energy demands of larger brains and the potential need for dinosaurs to evolve warm-bloodedness to support higher intelligence.
  • Speculative ideas about intelligent dinosaurs are mentioned, including references to fictional works that explore this theme.
  • Several participants emphasize the unpredictability of evolution, suggesting that it could lead to entirely different outcomes if the evolutionary process were repeated.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on whether dinosaurs could have evolved higher intelligence. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing hypotheses and uncertainties present.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the speculative nature of the discussion, the dependence on interpretations of fossil evidence, and the unresolved questions about the evolutionary pathways that could lead to increased intelligence.

Gold Barz
Messages
464
Reaction score
0
Do you think that if they weren't killed off and survived the extinction events, some of the dino's would have gotten more intelligent to the point where its just an intelligence arms race? I guess the main word here is potential, did they have the potential to do it?Is it true before they died off there were clues left behind pointing to hightened intelligence (bigger brains?)
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
They were certainly as intelligent as say a bird.
So what do you mean by intelligence?

Is what you are really asking is were there any sentient ones?
I've never seen anything that would say yes.
But, I suppose its possible we might just not have found the data.
 
I am asking if did the dinosaurs have the potential to be a lot smarter than they were? maybe even the potential to be as smart as us, if they had survived those mass extinction events that led up to their demise?
 
Gold Barz said:
I am asking if did the dinosaurs have the potential to be a lot smarter than they were? maybe even the potential to be as smart as us, if they had survived those mass extinction events that led up to their demise?


Well even if they evolved intelligence, would they stay dinosaurs in the process? Look at the evolution of birds, who are directly evolved from dinosaurs; first the dino evolved limited flight, and when that proved to be an adaptive winner futher evolution took place to enhance the flight ability. And in that process those dinosaurs evoved from therapsids into archaeopteryx.

I presume that evolution of large brains, assuming there was some original adaptive edge to it, would not be less transforming. Think that our human brains use some whopping percentage of our energy budget, so in order to really exploit an improved brain the dino would have to evolve a better energy management system than the reptile one.
 
So the dinosaur body plan just didnt have what it took to potentially become intelligent?

Also, weren't there findings to suggest that some dino's were evolving as social creatures?
 
Last edited:
Why do you think all dinosaurs were so terribly dumb?

It isn't idiocy to die from the effects of a big rock falling from the sky, it is simply sheer bad luck.
 
Based on fossil evidence, admittedly a poor sample, dinosaurs show some increase in encephalization quotients ( g of brain per Kg of body) over their time up to the end of the Cretaceous.

Mammals show a similar trend from the Paleocene to the Pliocene.

Whether encephalization quotient means anything or if the trends really reflect a major change, is up to you to decide.

See this:
http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/dinosaurs/anatomy/Brain.shtml
 
if they evolved to be more intelligent they would have passed our intelligence about 64,900,000 years ago
 
selfAdjoint said:
the dino would have to evolve a better energy management system than the reptile one.
Some people say that there were warm blooded dinos.
Birds for instance, are warm blooded.
 
  • #10
Some say birds did not evolve from dinosaurs, but that both lines evolved from a common archosaur. (Just another theory *backs away slowly*)

Anyhow, what reason would dinos have for being sentient? We, presumably, are because it helped with social living & learning. Would dinos need the same awareness to function in a group? After all, they have weapons built-in for survival & don't need strong emotional bonds & social learning to work together.
 
  • #11
thats true dinosaurs would not achieve sentience unless it was beneficial for them. and as someone said earlier our brain uses up a lot of energy which the cold blooded reptiles wouldn't manage. so they would have to become warm blooded for a start.
 
  • #12
Check this site out, it talks about the "possible" intelligent dinosaurs.

http://web.ukonline.co.uk/michael.magee/awwls/wls.html

How credible is that site? is it based on science or fantasy?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
Read Robert Sawyer's QUINTAGLIO TRILOGY about a planet with raptor-like creatures that have evolved intelligence and society (culture and technology about 1 - 3 centuries behind present-day - sailing ships, telescopes and superstitions about firey Gods crossing the sky in chariots.).

(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0765309742/?tag=pfamazon01-20)
 
  • #14
selfAdjoint said:
Think that our human brains use some whopping percentage of our energy budget
Twenty to twenty-five per cent.
 
  • #15
DaveC426913 said:
Twenty to twenty-five per cent.

Thanks, Dave.

We are the only genus we know evolved intelligence and the fossil record suggests that to do it we had to change our lifestyle from a pretty much vegetarian tree dweller to scavenging savannah dweller and then to hunter-gatherer. We changed our basic body plan in the process. The original energy budget of pliopithecus or whatever wouldn't have supported a Homo Habilis brain, much less a modern human's.
 
  • #16
So selfAdjoint, is it safe to say that it is likely the dinosaurs would have not been anymore intelligent than they were before they died out? even the raptors and the troodons?
 
  • #17
we can't know for certain either way.
we don't even know what might evolve from things in existence right now.
 
  • #18
Worse than "we don't know for certain", we can't even guess. Evolution can't be predicted. It is an effect that results from countless factors in the environment over countless generations. It could go any direction.

It would not even go the same direction twice.

As Steven J. Gould posits: rewind the evolutionary clock and run it again, and we will assuredly get a COMPLETELY different result. There's no guarantee that something as basic as our bilateral symmetry would dominate. The modern world could be dominated by the descendants of starfish.
 
  • #19
DaveC426913 said:
Worse than "we don't know for certain", we can't even guess.
Exactly. This topic calls for completely wild speculation. There is no way to answer this question in a scientifically sound manner. Thus, this thread is closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
5K