Could electromagnetism work in a catapult?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using electromagnetism in catapult systems, specifically comparing traditional mechanisms like trebuchets and classic catapults with potential electromagnetic designs. Participants explore the efficiency and accuracy of various energy sources for launching projectiles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers different catapult designs and questions the viability of using magnets as a launching mechanism. Some participants introduce the concept of steam and electromagnetic catapults, while others discuss the complexities of electromagnetic systems, including energy storage and heat generation.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing insights about electromagnetic propulsion and the challenges associated with it. There is a mix of perspectives on the efficiency of using magnets and the practicality of implementing such systems.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that magnets are not a source of energy and question the assumptions around their use in projectile launching. Concerns about the size and efficiency of harnesses in electromagnetic setups are also raised.

Hugo Camus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi! I am new to the forum and need a little of help in a science experiment
I wanted to ask you which of the following catapult systems will be more accurate and efficient:

1. Weight as the source of energy. The weight at the bottom of the beam moves back, the beam will go forward and the projectile at the top will be launched. a "trebuchet"

2. The clasic catapult

3. And I have the idea that perhaps a catapult with magnets might work, but I'm not sure if we would need very strong magnets

Please any help is appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I worked on the EMALs system for the US Navy some 16 years ago. The wikipedia article seems to suggest that it is all super simple and just the obvious thing to do. That certainly was not true 16 years ago, and I rather doubt that it is today.

One of the big issues on shipboard is weight and space. To make a fair comparison, the entire systems should be compared, including space and weight of the energy source, the control system, and the actuator itself. The electronic controls for such a system are huge. The currents required are extremely large, and generating the variable frequency AC required takes some really large power electronics. These large currents lead into another problem area, heat generation. Recall that power goes as I^2*R, and when the currents are extremely large throughout the entire system, there will be a terrific amount of heat generated.

Storing up the required energy burst is also a major problem. It can be done, but it is not simple and not cheap. It remains to be seen whether or not it can be done with sufficient reliability to go on shipboard.

When I worked for the Navy, we used to joke about how the all electric warship would require a second ship, a tender, to carry all the power electronics and a very long extension cord between the two.
 
The OP asks about using magnets, not electricity.
A magnet is not a source of energy. Yes, it will attract certain objects, accelerating them, but as soon as you try to use that to send the object as a projectile it acts the wrong way.
There are two ways you could overcome that. If using an electromagnet you could arrange for it to switch off at the right instant. So this is more like the electromagnetic propulsion previous responders have discussed. Or you could have a projectile that is not itself attracted to the magnet held in a harness which is. I doubt that second approach would be very efficient. The force on the harness would depend on its size, but a large harness would mean a lot of the KE is wasted.
 
haruspex said:
Or you could have a projectile that is not itself attracted to the magnet held in a harness which is. I doubt that second approach would be very efficient. The force on the harness would depend on its size, but a large harness would mean a lot of the KE is wasted.

This is essentially what is done with the rail gun where the circuit is completed by a shoe that does not travel down range with the projectile.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
19K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K