Could Jupiter Be Ignited for Fusion?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Simon666
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jupiter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical possibility of igniting Jupiter for nuclear fusion. Participants assert that Jupiter lacks the necessary mass (approximately 1% of what is required) and density (Lawson's criterion) to sustain fusion reactions. Historical events, such as the impact of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, demonstrate that even significant external forces do not ignite the planet. Additionally, combustion processes, which require oxidizers, are not applicable to Jupiter's gaseous composition, reinforcing the conclusion that natural ignition is impossible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lawson's criterion for nuclear fusion
  • Knowledge of celestial mechanics and planetary formation
  • Familiarity with combustion chemistry and oxidizers
  • Basic principles of nuclear fusion and energy production
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the conditions required for nuclear fusion in stars
  • Explore the composition and structure of gas giants like Jupiter
  • Investigate the effects of large celestial impacts on planetary atmospheres
  • Study the differences between brown dwarfs and gas giants in terms of fusion potential
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and science enthusiasts interested in planetary science, nuclear fusion, and the dynamics of gas giants.

  • #31
sceeth0 said:
The combustible seas of titan are mostly methane right? What's the estimated temperature of those seas? If you can't raise the temperature high enough, you aren't going to have the energy to break apart existing bonds. I'm thinking even if you had an arbitrary unit of methane and oxygen to burn, it wouldn't release enough energy to ignite the next unit, and the reaction of would die. Anyone with a chem book should be able to crunch the numbers and check this.

From what i can see the surface temperature of Titan is ~94K. The energy typically released by a methane combustion is ~882kJ/mol. i have also found the heat capacity of methane to be 35.69kJ/(mol K). The temperature required to sustain combustion is 580℃(853K) therefore if one reaction were to pass its energy to the next in perfect order, i calculate that you need to increase the temperature by 759℃ in order to do this we need 27088kJ/mol of energy. This energy is much larger than the energy released by the combustion, therefore it is safe to believe that a self sustaining combustion of methane on the surface of Titan would be impossible, the energy need to bring the methane to combustion point is far to great to self-sustain.

I used constants applied at 1ATM, although the pressure on Titan is 1.44ATM, in this case i believe that even with a slight pressure difference, the combustion is still not able to sustain itself, but i might be wrong.

To answer the question, the reaction would ignite the next particle, depending on what your initial energy supply is, but the reaction would eventually die out.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
Arian said:
Why do we say "burn"? You can't get a planetery mass to burn unless is hass more then 50 %of its mass as oxygen.

"Burn" in the fusion sense. A fusion burn is a self-sustaining fusion reaction, which Jupiter can't sustain with its current mass or composition. With deuterium at 1 in 150 abundance (instead of its normal 1 in 6500) a fusion burn could be triggered by a sufficiently energetic triggering input, but deuterium burning rapidly becomes explosive and the planet would probably blow off its outer layers or even disrupt totally. Fortunately concentrated deuterium is hard to come by in our solar system. Inside brown dwarfs above 13 Jupiter masses the core is hot enough for a sustained burn even at the lower concentration, but it's quickly used up in about 50 million years. For comparison hydrogen fusion in the lowest mass stars can last 10 trillion years.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K