Could Quantum Mechanics Explain a Super Heavy Universe?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mitcho
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Gerald Schroeder's assertion that quantum mechanics could lead to the creation of a "super heavy" universe. Key concepts include the Uncertainty Principle and its implications for spacetime fluctuations, which may result in unstable 'false vacuums' connected via wormholes. Notably, Guth and Fahri's work on the inflaton field suggests that quantum tunneling could enable inflation in these 'baby universes'. However, Sean Carroll expresses skepticism regarding the feasibility of this phenomenon until a comprehensive theory of quantum gravity is established.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Uncertainty Principle in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of 'false vacuums' in cosmology
  • Knowledge of the inflaton field and its role in cosmic inflation
  • Basic grasp of wormhole theory and its implications for spacetime
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Uncertainty Principle on quantum fields
  • Study Guth and Fahri's theories on 'baby universes' and their inflationary processes
  • Explore Sean Carroll's cosmological models and their critiques
  • Investigate current developments in quantum gravity theories
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, physicists, and students interested in the intersection of quantum mechanics and cosmology, particularly those exploring theories of universe creation and inflation.

mitcho
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Watching a video of Gerald Schroeder, I was fascinated by his claim that if the universe were created as a result of our current understanding of quantum mechanics, the universe would be a closed "super heavy" space. The link below goes directly to the point in the video where he says it and it goes until about 7:15. Would I be able to get some learned opinions on this?
Thanks

www.youtube.com/watch?v=yV-LzTO-xdg#t=06m19s
 
Space news on Phys.org


Mitcho,

If by 'data', you mean records of universe popping out of our spacetime, then no, there isn't. But there are pretty strong theoretical reasons to believe it can happen. The idea goes like this:

The Uncertainty Principle allows for fields to fluctuate (keep in mind, however, it's your observations that are actually fluctuating - the field doesn't ever have an actual value, instead, it has an egienstate, but taking different observations on it yields different classical values.) between different classical values. For example, an empty vacuum will have a temperature given by [tex]T_{dS}=\frac{H}{2 \pi} \sim 10^{-33} eV[/tex]If we treat curved spacetime as a gravitational field, the UP should predict fluctuations in spacetime. This should create 'false vacuums', unstable states that are not at a desirable energy level. They would be connected to the background spacetime via a wormhole. However, they should rapidly collapse. But, Guth and Fahri showed that if the inflaton field (the field that drives inflation) managed, via quantum tunneling, to reach a false vacuum, then inflation could occur in this 'baby universe', allowing it to grow to an enormous size. Since wormholes are incredibly unstable, it would quickly collapse, allowing the baby universe to become its own spacetime.

In the past, it seemed that there was very good reason that this could happen. But, I haven't heard too much about it recently, and Sean Carroll ( A cosmologist whose model relies on this 'baby universe' production) expressed his feelings that he is less certain it can actually happen. We really won't know until a proper theory of quantum gravity is fully developed. Trying to apply quantum mechanics by itself to cosmology may be like trying to apply general relativity to particle physics.

The original paper by Guth and Fahri isn't available on the internet, but here are two I managed to find:

The Universe out of a Monopole in a Laboratory?
http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0602084v3.pdf

How to Create a Universe
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/3196/1/Spec.pdf
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
852
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K