Could the LHC potentially form a black hole?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsWanabe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole Lhc
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has been speculated to potentially form small black holes under certain theoretical conditions, specifically in models with large extra dimensions. While traditional black holes form from the collapse of massive stars, a black hole could theoretically form if mass is compressed to a Planck mass (approximately 10-8 kg) within a Planck length (approximately 10-35 m). However, the likelihood of black hole production at the LHC is low, as this relies on speculative physics and has not been observed in experimental results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black hole formation and astrophysics
  • Familiarity with the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Knowledge of Planck mass and Planck length concepts
  • Basic grasp of Hawking radiation and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "large extra dimensions in particle physics"
  • Study "Hawking radiation and black hole thermodynamics"
  • Explore "primordial black holes and their formation"
  • Read about "safety assessments of high-energy particle collisions"
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the implications of high-energy particle collisions and black hole formation theories.

PhysicsWanabe
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hey I heard from a couple different places on the internet that there's a possibility that a black hole hypothetically could be formed by the LHC. I thought that black holes were formed by the implosion of a huge star that keeps going in on itself due to gravity. Is it true that this could happen at the LHC?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
PhysicsWanabe said:
Hey I heard from a couple different places on the internet that there's a possibility that a black hole hypothetically could be formed by the LHC. I thought that black holes were formed by the implosion of a huge star that keeps going in on itself due to gravity. Is it true that this could happen at the LHC?

It is indeed true that the typical example of black hole formation is in the collapse of a sufficiently massive star. However, we believe that a small black hole can be formed whenever mass is compressed beyond a certain size. For example, if you had a Planck mass (##\sim 10^{-8}~\mathrm{kg}##) compressed to within a Planck length (##\sim 10^{-35}~\mathrm{m}##), you would create a black hole. In particular, in the very early universe, when all of the mass in the universe was much closer together, the formation of so-called primordial black holes would have been possible.

In certain hypothetical extensions of the Standard Model (mainly models with "large" extra dimensions of spacetime), the true Planck length could be longer than the ##\sim 10^{-35}~\mathrm{m}## distance we derive from measuring gravity at long scales. In these models, at some high energy, the strength of gravity becomes sharply stronger than what we measure at the normal energy scales of the solar system or table-top experiments. In principle, above this characteristic energy, the formation of black holes would become feasible. Such small black holes wouldn't be expected to be very dangerous, because they would decay quickly due to Hawking radiation.

It is unlikely that black holes would be produced at the LHC. The mechanism relies on highly speculative ideas and no other signatures of this type of new physics has been seen so far. Wikipedia has extensive discussions at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_black_hole and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_of_high_energy_particle_collision_experiments
 
PhysicsWanabe said:
Hey I heard from a couple different places on the internet that there's a possibility that a black hole hypothetically could be formed by the LHC. I thought that black holes were formed by the implosion of a huge star that keeps going in on itself due to gravity. Is it true that this could happen at the LHC?

You are a bit late to the party.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=368484

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K