Could This Be the Theory of Everything?

[Antonio Lao]

If force is equivalent to time or saying that force is directly proportional to time implies that if there is no force or if two equal and opposite forces are in equilibrium then time is zero. But because of the existence of Planck constant, Planck energy, Planck length, and Planck time, the two opposite forces at the infinitesimal domain of the local region of spacetime cannot be truly equal in magnitude.

Because of the existence of an infinitesimal differential force \Delta F, a movement exist between two parallel worlds. This is the phenomenon of vacuum fluctuation.

 

[Antonio Lao]

The existence of two infinitesimal differential forces which are not exactly equal in magnitude also implies that the outer product of these two forces are less than unity and the inner product of these two forces is greater than zero.

F_i \times F_j \leq 1

F_i \cdot F_j \geq 0

 

[russ_watters]

Those calculations are not part of my theory I don't think.

Then it isn't a "theory of everything," is it?

 

[PRyckman]

I don't understand the math too well could you further explain it in english?
I find it interesting that you say approximate unity. To me that says some guy with a real affinity for turning patterns into a math formula came up with something that can almost explain it in all situations. "Like the guy from A Beautiful Mind" (i forget the real mans name)

But please tell me as best you can what that equation means. What it's basic meanings are, and what happens at extremes of certain variables, if you would be so kind.

I don't understand what the dot signifies, division?
And The subscript i?

 

[Antonio Lao]

From vector analysis, The vector (cross or outer) product of two vectors is given by

V_i \times V_j = |V_i||V_j|sin \theta.

The |V_i| denotes magnitude of the vector. \theta denotes the angle betweens the vectors.

If \theta is 90 degrees then the vectors are perpendicular also called orthogonal and the vector product is just the product of the magnitudes. The subscript i and j are used only to differentiate different vectors. If the magnitude is unity then the product is almost unity for all angle almost 90 degrees.

The scalar (dot or inner) product of two vectors is given by

V_i \cdot V_j = |V_i||V_j|cos \theta.

If \theta is 0 degrees then the vectors are collinear also called congruent and the scalar product is just the product of the magnitudes. For angle almost 90 degrees the product is nearly zero.

In reality, the dynamic angle (changing continuously) is almost 90 degrees for vector products to be approximately unity and almost zero for scalar products. If angle is almost zero then the vector products is almost zero and the scalar products almost unity.

 

[PRyckman]

So when these vectors are near collinear (coexisting?) their magnitude (energy?) turns to near zero. Could this be akin to the ether we look for?
When the vectors coincide they create a space this near empty space has a certain time frame. If you increase the magnitude in the equation, but leave the angle near zero then the scalar product is higher.

So we have two dimensions of space here?
Angle and Magnitude of a vector(distance)

I'll postulate that the increase in magnitude of the vector would be directly related to the time frame rate. The angle, at point of black hole becomes 0

Further if that be correct it may be that time from my equation be t=V D=E(Vi)

 

[Antonio Lao]

Only in mathematics can the angle become zero or 90 degrees. In the real world, the angle can only be almost zero or almost 90. This is just like saying that at the center of the black hole there is no singularity because singularity is a mathematical reality and can never be a physical reality. Cosmologists, including Thorne, Hawking, and Penrose, refuse to talk about the naked singularity. They would rather censor it.

So the conclusion is that no vector in the entire universe coincides. Each is unique with its own magnitude and direction. Some are nearly perpendicular and nearly collinear but half of all these vectors are the exact opposite of the other in term of magnitude but nearly opposite in term of direction. This nearly opposite in direction is responsible for the dynamic of the universe.

 

[kurious]

Only in mathematics can the angle become zero or 90 degrees

I wonder if field lines coming out of charges point to all angles or maybe just most?

 

[Antonio Lao]

The wave property called phase is a way of describing the angle between the wave vectors. For all waves, the product of wavelength and frequency is the velocity of the wave. My question is what happens when the frequency is 1? Since frequency is the inverse of the period of the wave, 1 frequency is 1 period, 1 cycle per 1 second. My next question is how do we add all the waves with 1 frequency and wavelength of 186,000 miles? Does the resultant wave have infinite amplitude if all waves are in phase? If they are completely out of phase is the resultant wave amplitude zero?

 

[Reflector]

Could the double slit be the SAME slit separated in space and time as viewed by us? Maybe you can use this idea...

 

[Antonio Lao]

Could the double slit be the SAME slit separated in space and time as viewed by us? Maybe you can use this idea...

There is a metric for spacetime at the Planck length. The topology of spacetime is that of a sphere with two holes. The distance between the holes is the metric and the holes is similar to a double slits configuration.