B Could we ever create a black hole?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter atlanticus
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Creating a black hole is theoretically possible according to current physics, but it remains highly unlikely and impractical. Simulating some properties of black holes has already been achieved, but generating an actual black hole would require immense energy and resources. The discussion also touches on the challenges of safely approaching a black hole, particularly regarding its size and the effects of evaporation. The concept of a small, manageable black hole for educational purposes raises questions about feasibility and safety. Overall, while the idea is intriguing, significant scientific and logistical hurdles remain.
atlanticus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Could humans ever create a black hole or get near one?
I feel like that would further people's understanding of physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
atlanticus said:
TL;DR Summary: Could humans ever create a black hole or get near one?

I feel like that would further people's understanding of physics.
No law of physics prevents it, but it's highly unlikely, and it certainly wouldn't be easy. If by "creating a black hole" you mean reproducing or simulating some of its properties, that's already been done.

The question of whether we'll ever be able to get near to one is a question about long-distance travel, and a bit about black holes (in the sense of what it would be like to be near to one).
 
So you want a handy 1 kg black hole to pass around the classroom ?
It will be smaller than a normal proton, how will you hold it ?
How will you fund the incredible amount of energy needed to create it ?
 
Baluncore said:
So you want a handy 1 kg black hole to pass around the classroom ?
With a mass that low, you'll have to hand the evaporating "hot potato" around very fast.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top