MHB Could you explain me the definition?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the definition of p-adic integers, denoted as $\mathbf{Z}_p$, which are infinite tuples of integers modulo powers of a prime p, ensuring that each element is congruent to the previous one modulo increasing powers of p. The concept of inverse limits is introduced as a way to understand how these tuples are formed, emphasizing the relationships between the elements across different moduli. Examples illustrate the construction of p-adic integers through solutions to equations, demonstrating how these integers can be represented in a series format. The conversation highlights that while every integer can be represented as a p-adic integer for some prime, not all p-adic numbers correspond to integers. Overall, the thread provides a clear explanation of p-adic integers and their properties through both definitions and practical examples.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! (Smile)

According to my notes:

Let $p \in \mathbb{P}$.

The set of the integer p-adic numbers is defined as:

$$\mathbb{Z}_p:= \{( \overline{x_n})_{n \in \mathbb{N}_0} \in \Pi _{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\mathbb{Z}}{p^{n+1} \mathbb{Z}} | x_{n+1} \equiv x_n \pmod {p^{n+1}}\}$$

Could you explain me the definition? (Sweating)

Remark: The inverse limit is:

$$\mathbb{Z}_p=\lim_{\overleftarrow{n}} \frac{\mathbb{Z}}{p^n \mathbb{Z}}$$Could you also explain me the difinition of the inverse limit? (Worried)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nitpick : $\Bbb Z_p$ is a sad notation for $p$-adics. Reminds me of cyclic groups. How about $\mathbf{Z}_p$?

The definition is really straightforward as written. $\mathbf{Z}_p$, the set of $p$-adic integers, is the collection of "infinite-tuples" $(x_0, x_1, x_2, \cdots )$ with $x_k \in \Bbb Z/p^{k+1}\Bbb Z$ such that each $x_{i+1}$ is equivalent to $x_i$ modulo $p^{i+1}$.

Wait, wait, that didn't even made sense to me(!). I have a great ignorance for these kind of symbolic definitions, so they won't make sense to anyone. Let's look at examples, they always give a good notion of what is going on "behind the scene".

Consider the equation $x^2 = -1$ in $\Bbb Z$. This has, of course, no solutions. However, this has solutions when considered over certain finite fields. $x^2 = -1$ has trivial solutions over $\Bbb Z/Z\Bbb Z$ (itself a trivial group :p), no solutions over $\Bbb Z/3\Bbb Z$ (only quadratic res. are 1 and 0), neither any over $\Bbb Z/4\Bbb Z$ (only quadratic res. again are 1 and 0). The smallest field in which it does is $\Bbb Z/5\Bbb Z$ : $2^2 = 4 = -1$ and $3^2 = 9 = 10 - 1 = -1$.

Consider the 2 modulo 5 solution. So we know that $x = 2 + 5y$ and we can sub that in : $-1 = x^2 = (2 + 5y)^2 = 4 + 25y^2 + 20y$ which reduces to $20y = -5 + 25y^2$, i.e., $20y = -5 \pmod{25}$ which after inversion gives $y = 1 \pmod{5}$. We can sub that back in $x = 2 + 5y$ to get $x = 2 + 5(1 + 5y_1)$ thus $x = 7 \pmod{25}$, which is in turn a solution in $\Bbb Z_{25}$. By similar calculations, you'll end up with $x = 57 \pmod{125}$ in $\Bbb Z/{125}\Bbb Z$ and so on and so on.

The specialty of this chain of solutions is once found a solution $x_{i+1}$ in $\Bbb Z_{5^{i+1}}$, $x_{i+1}$ can be mapped back to $x_i$ modulo $5^i$ (that's precisely the way they are constructed). Thus you can construct an "infinite-tuple" $x = (2, 7, 57, \cdots)$ in the infinite direct product $\prod \Bbb Z/5^{i+1} \Bbb Z$ such that each elt $x_{i+1}$ can be "mapped back" to $x_i$ using homomorphisms (in this case, modulo $5^{i+1}$). This construction precisely gives us a ring, and out "infinite tuple" satisfies $x^2 = -1$ so we are kind of "expanding out" the usual integers. This is a possible construction of $5$-adic integers, and in formal terms, your symbolic definition with $n = 5$ subbed in.

This is all there is to the definition of $p$-adics. They are the collection of a bunch of elements from $\Bbb Z/p^k \Bbb Z$ for $k > 0$ such that there is a collection of homomorphisms from $\Bbb Z/p^{i+1}\Bbb Z$ to $\Bbb Z/p^i \Bbb Z$. The notion of inverse limits are just a generalization of this idea.

EDIT Thought that I'd rather add this to make the concept clear. Consider $10$-adic numbers (warning - not a field). Elements are all of the form $(x_1, x_2, x_3, \cdots )$ such that $x_i \in \Bbb Z/10^i \Bbb Z$ for all $i$. Recall that an integer modulo $10^i$ is really the first $10^i$ digits of the integer, the rest of them chopped off. In that case, for $(x_1, x_2, \cdots )$, $x_1$ can be viewed as the last digit of some integer, $(x_2 - x_1)/10$ as the second digit from the right, $(x_3-x_2)/100$ as the third digit from the right, and so on and so forth. Thus, every $10$-adic $(x_i)$ has a corresponding infinite series representation $\sum_{n = 0}^\infty a_n 10^n$. For in general $k$-adic numbers, similar can be stated, but the "infinite integers" then becomes "infinite integers base $k$", i.e., the series representation is of the form $\sum_{n = 0}^\infty a_n k^n$. From this you can verify that every integer is a $p$-adic integer for some prime $p$ : take $13$ and $p = 3$. Modulo $3$, $13 = 1$ hence our sequence is $(1, \cdots)$. $13 = 4$ modulo $9$, thus we get another term $(1, 4, \cdots)$. However, all the higher powers of $3$ are greater than $13$ so the rest of the terms are all $13$ : the desired $3$-adic expansion is $(1, 4, 13, 13, 13, \cdots)$. However, there are $p$-adics that can't be represented as integers - this is pretty obvious to construct as every $p$-adic rep for integers eventually stabilize to some fixed integer.
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top