Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around the difficulty and content of the 1869 Harvard Entrance Exam and a comparison with the MIT entrance exam. Participants explore the relevance of the subjects tested, particularly the inclusion of Latin and Greek, and reflect on their own experiences and perceptions regarding these historical academic standards.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Historical
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express that while the Latin and Greek sections of the Harvard exam may be outdated, the other subjects remain relevant today.
- Others highlight the difficulty of the MIT exam, noting that the English section would be particularly challenging due to unfamiliarity with certain authors.
- A participant questions whether Latin and Greek were common knowledge at the time of the exams, suggesting that they were part of a standard curriculum for students aiming for university.
- Another participant speculates about the expectations for students to be familiar with geography and authors relevant to their time and region, particularly in relation to MIT's exam.
- There is a humorous remark about a specific question from the MIT exam, suggesting it might have been a "secret code question" for privileged students.
- A later reply provides a historical context, indicating that Latin was a compulsory subject in UK education systems well into the 20th century, which may reflect broader educational practices of the time.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the relevance of Latin and Greek in modern education or the overall difficulty of the exams. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the historical context and expectations of students during that era.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include assumptions about educational standards and practices in the past, as well as the varying interpretations of the relevance of classical languages in contemporary education.