Counting Cosets in Abstract Algebra | Pinter's Self Study

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sdembi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosets partitions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the concept of counting cosets in Abstract Algebra, specifically from Chapter 13 of Pinter's textbook. A coset is defined as the set of products of the form "ah" where "a" belongs to group G and "h" belongs to subgroup H. The confusion arises regarding the relationship between the number of elements in G and the number of cosets formed, with participants clarifying that cosets partition G and that multiple elements of G can lead to the same coset if they belong to H. Ultimately, the number of cosets is determined by the index of H in G, not simply the number of elements in G.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically groups and subgroups.
  • Familiarity with the definition and properties of cosets.
  • Knowledge of partitioning sets in mathematical contexts.
  • Basic comprehension of Abstract Algebra as presented in Pinter's textbook.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of the index of a subgroup in group theory.
  • Learn about Lagrange's Theorem and its implications for cosets.
  • Explore examples of cosets in finite groups to solidify understanding.
  • Review the properties of equivalence relations as they relate to cosets.
USEFUL FOR

Students of Abstract Algebra, particularly those studying group theory, educators teaching these concepts, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of cosets and their properties.

sdembi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am doing self study of Abstract Algebra from Pinter.
My doubt is regarding Chap 13 Counting Cosets:
A coset contains all products of the form "ah" where a belongs to G and h belongs to H where H is a subgroup of G. So each coset should contain the number of elements in H. Now the number of cosets should be the number of elements in G since each element of G is used to construct a coset. So the number of elements in all cosets should be number of elements in G*Number of elements in H - But the family of cosets is a partition of G and should have the same number of elements of G... there is definitely something wrong in the second-third line of this argument... but I am not able to pin it down
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sdembi said:
Hi,
Now the number of cosets should be the number of elements in G since each element of G is used to construct a coset.

Do two different elements of G necessarily construct two different cosets ?

For example, suppose the two elements of G are h1, h2 and that h_1 \in H and h_2 \in H.
 
Thanks - The coset of h1 would be the set of elements h1*h and that of h2 would be h2*h for all h belonging to H - Not sure why they should not be different.
I am not able to understand why the number of cosets should not be equal to the number of elements in the set G. Am sure I'm missing something very basic.
 
If h \in H then the coset hH = H. If you multiply an element of a subgroup by another element in the subgroup then the product is in the subgroup.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sdembi
Understood - Thanks a ton...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
642
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
994
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
645
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
970
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K