Counting letters in a number between 1 and 1000

  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Counting
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on an algorithm designed to count the number of letters in the English words for numbers between 1 and 1000, excluding spaces and hyphens. The algorithm utilizes three lists that store the letter counts for single digits, tens, and teens. The function processes the number by breaking it down into its digits and determining the letter count based on its length (1, 2, or 3 digits). Key points include the need for efficiency improvements, such as eliminating unnecessary intermediate variables and using more concise return statements. There are suggestions to enhance the robustness of the code to handle inputs outside the specified range, like numbers greater than 1000. The importance of code readability and consistent formatting is also emphasized, with recommendations for using comments to aid understanding. Overall, the discussion highlights both the algorithm's functionality and areas for optimization and clarity.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
Excluding spaces and hyphens, how many letters are there in a given number between 1 and 1000 (inclusive)? How can I make my algorithm more efficient?

Python:
dig_lens = [4,3,3,5,4,4,3,5,5,4]
tens_lens = [0,3,6,6,6,5,5,7,6,6]
teens_lens = [0,6,6,8,8,7,7,9,8,8]

def num_letters(n):
    nlist = []
    while(n>=1):
        nlist.append(n%10)
        n//=10
    length = len(nlist)

    if(n==1000):
        return 11

    count = 0
    if(length == 1):
        count = count + dig_lens[n]

    if(length == 2):
        if(nlist[1]==1 and nlist[0]>0):
            count = count + teens_lens[nlist[0]]
        else:
            count = count + tens_lens[nlist[1]] + dig_lens[nlist[0]]

    if(length == 3):
        count = count + dig_lens[nlist[2]] + 7
        if(nlist[1]==0 and nlist[0]>0):
            count = count + 3 + dig_lens[nlist[0]]
        elif(nlist[1]==1 and nlist[0]>0):
            count = 3 + count + teens_lens[nlist[0]]
        else:
            count = 3 + count + tens_lens[nlist[1]] + dig_lens[nlist[0]]

    return count

##e.g.##
print(num_letters(816))
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Technology news on Phys.org
Does it ever pronounce "hundred"?
 
it does pronounce hundred - that's accounted for in the first line of the length=3 case!
 
Last edited:
OK, I see what you're doing. Hundred is "+7".
Eleven is "6".
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
If length == 1 then you do not need to test if length == 2 (use elif) Edit: or if you are done then return the answer.

You could use count += instead of count = count + ... but if count is 0 then you don't need to include it in any sums anyway. Edit: you hardly need an intermediate count, if you know the answer just return it.

Edit: use more spaces and use them consistently

Python:
dig_lens = [4, 3, 3, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 5, 4]
tens_lens = [0, 3, 6, 6, 6, 5, 5, 7, 6, 6]
teens_lens = [0, 6, 6, 8, 8, 7, 7, 9, 8, 8]def num_letters(n):
    nlist = []
    while n >= 1:
        nlist.append(n % 10)
        n //= 10
    length = len(nlist)

    if n == 1000:
        return 11

    if length == 1:
        return dig_lens[n]

    if length == 2:
        if nlist[1] == 1 and nlist[0] > 0:
            return teens_lens[nlist[0]]
        else:
            return tens_lens[nlist[1]] + dig_lens[nlist[0]]

    if length == 3:
        count = dig_lens[nlist[2]] + 7
        if nlist[1] == 0 and nlist[0] > 0:
            return count + 3 + dig_lens[nlist[0]]
        if nlist[1] == 1 and nlist[0] > 0:
            return count + 3 + teens_lens[nlist[0]]
        else:
            return count + 3 + tens_lens[nlist[1]] + dig_lens[nlist[0]]

    raise RuntimeError("Can't handle more than 1,000")##e.g.##
print(num_letters(10000))
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
Notice that the size of the number is an input, which means a user might not cooperate with the constraints. How robust is your program if the input parameter were 1,001? Or 10,000?

See how flexible and universal and bulletproof you can make it.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
pbuk said:
Edit: you hardly need an intermediate count, if you know the answer just return it.
Yeah, I started thinking I was going to try and do some clever recursive algorithm, but realized it'd just be easier to split it into cases - but didn't get rid of the intermediate count.
 
Sorry, I have edited and re-edited my code, bad habit. It is prettier now. Should have just passed it through the Black parser straight off, my typing is a bit haphazard after a Friday night in the pub for the first time in 18 months.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes Filip Larsen and sysprog
Comments are good, for those who are trying to review your code.
I had a bunch of false starts before I got a handle on what it was doing.
 
  • Like
Likes pbuk
  • #10
pbuk said:
if n == 1000:
return 11
Looks like that test should use the original value of n to trigger properly?
 
  • #11
Filip Larsen said:
Looks like that test should use the original value of n to trigger properly?
whoopsie, yeah that and the length=1 case ought to be before the loop
 

Similar threads

Back
Top