Counting Seating Arrangments of Couples at a Round Table

  • Thread starter Thread starter e(ho0n3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Counting Table
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the seating arrangements of 20 people, specifically 10 married couples, around a round table. The correct approach involves treating each couple as a single entity, leading to the formula (20 - n - 1)! for arrangements, where n represents the number of couples seated together. The confusion arises from distinguishing between the total number of entities and the remaining unpaired individuals. The final conclusion clarifies that the arrangement of paired and unpaired objects can coexist in the calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of factorial notation and permutations
  • Basic concepts of combinatorial mathematics
  • Familiarity with circular arrangements in probability
  • Knowledge of pairing and grouping in mathematical contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study combinatorial proofs in probability theory
  • Learn about circular permutations and their applications
  • Explore advanced topics in factorial calculations and their implications
  • Investigate real-world applications of seating arrangements in event planning
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, educators, and students interested in probability theory and combinatorial mathematics.

e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Counting Seating Arrangments of Couples at a Round Table

I'm reading this example in my probability book which is I'm not understanding. It says:

There are 19! ways of arranging 20 people around a table. The number of arrangements that result in a specified set of n men sitting next to their wives can most easily be obtained by first thinking of each of the n married couples as being single entities. If this were the case, then we would need to arrange 20 - n entities around a round table, and there are clearly (20 - n - 1)! such arrangements.

There are 10 married couples by the way. The "20 - n entities" part is bugging me. Shouldn't that be 10 - n, given that there are 10 entities/married couples. I also don't understand how the (20 - n - 1)! part follows.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why ist it 10-n? If there is one married couple, there are 18 singletons, hence 19 objects to arrange (amazing what thinking of an example can do..). Thus if there are n couples hence how many single people? Now how many 'objects' are you arranging in a circle?
 
matt grime said:
Thus if there are n couples hence how many single people? Now how many 'objects' are you arranging in a circle?

Technically, there are no single people (they're all in couples). However, if n of the couples have already been seated, then there are 20 - 2n seats around the table for the remaining 10 - n couples or 20 - 2n people.
 
Last edited:
What does that show? (Apart from the fact that you seem to be focussed on the wrong thing.)
 
To be honest, I just don't understand the explanation. Here's how I would count the seating arrangements:

First, I would pick an ordering of the pairs and number them 1 through 20. Then I would sit pair 1 by first picking a seat for the woman and then picking a side for the man. This can be done in one of 20 * 2 ways.

Then I proceed with pair 2. The woman can sit in one of 18 ways. In 2 of those ways, the man is forced to sit in one spot. For the other 16 locations, the man can sit to the right or left. Hence, there are 2 + 16 * 2 ways to sit pair 2.

For pair 3, things get someone more complicated because I have to take into account of where pairs 1 and 2 are sitting. Ditto for pairs 4 - 10.
 
Forget the married status or otherwise of the objects.

1. There are 20 objects,

2. we pair up 2n of them in n pairs.

3. We wish to arrange these n pairs and 20-2n remaining unpaired items in a circle.

4.That is we have 20-2n+n=20-n things to put in a circle

5. which can be done (20-n-1)! ways.

which of 1-5 is confusing?

Notice that the question does not distinguish between the order of the two objects in a pair, just that they are paired.
 
OK. I understand now. 3 had me confused because I thought it didn't make any sense to arrange paired and unpaired objects. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
21K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K