Counting Total Spin for N Two-Level Systems (TLS)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Haris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin Spin 1/2
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on counting total spin states for N two-level systems (TLS) in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the alignment of states with fixed r. For r = N/2, there are N+1 states, while for r = N/2 - 1, the number of states is (N-1)^2. The participants clarify that the correct formula for counting states is 2r + 1, not 2m + 1, and emphasize the confusion surrounding the multiplicity of states in irreducible representations (irreps) of SU(2).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and spin systems
  • Familiarity with SU(2) group theory and its irreducible representations
  • Knowledge of matrix representations in quantum systems
  • Basic concepts of state counting in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the formula 2r + 1 in quantum state counting
  • Explore the properties of irreducible representations of SU(2)
  • Investigate the significance of spin multiplicity in quantum mechanics
  • Review the original paper linked in the discussion for detailed examples and figures
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and students studying two-level systems and group theory in physics will benefit from this discussion.

Haris
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I am having considerable trouble understanding the addition of spins. The context in which I am studying this is the Tavis-Cummings Model.
Statement:
"Assume that r and m mean total spin and projection of spin along z, respectively. For N-TLS the total spin (r) can assume N+1 to 1/2 or 0 spin depending on N being even or odd. For a fixed r the value of m varies from +j to -j in integer steps. R is the operator whose eigen-values are r. The basis choice is |r,m>."
Now then, if I intend to make a matrix pretaining to single transitions of the composite system, i align the states with fixed r. For fixed r I have 2m+1 states. When r=N/2 my states are N+1 as simple substitution verifies. However, when r=N/2 -1 the number of states are (N-1)^2. It gets weirder for N/2 -2

Questions:
1) Why is r =N/2 -1 valid as individual spin is half not 1.
2) The counting on main diagonals are pretty confusing. For each irrep of SU(2) there's 2m+1 states and that's fine. But the multiplicity of each state is entirely vague to me.

I have linked the original paper and the figure 1 is where the counting is shown.

1730022772893.png
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Correction: its 2r+1 instead of 2m+1
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K