Negative T for a spin 1 system in the canonical ensemble

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the analysis of negative temperatures in a spin 1 system of N particles within the canonical ensemble framework. The partition function is defined as Z=(1+2cosh(βε))^N, leading to an average energy expression of ⟨E⟩=-2Nε sinh(βε)/(1+2cosh(βε)). The derived dimensionless energy equation, involving β and magnetic field B, reveals that for real temperatures to exist, the condition ⟨E⟩²<4/3 must hold. The discussion highlights the paradox of average energy exceeding the maximum possible energy when considering negative temperatures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of canonical ensemble statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with partition functions in thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of spin systems and energy states
  • Proficiency in solving quadratic equations and logarithmic functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of negative temperatures in statistical mechanics
  • Research the role of partition functions in determining thermodynamic properties
  • Explore the behavior of spin systems under varying magnetic fields
  • Learn about the mathematical treatment of energy states in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, as well as researchers studying spin systems and energy state dynamics in quantum systems.

Gabriel Maia
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
I'm interested in an apparent inconsistency with the result for negative temperatures for a spin 1 system of N particles.

The partition function of such a system is

\begin{equation}
Z=(1+2\cosh(\beta \,\epsilon))^{N}
\end{equation}
where each particle can be in one of three energy states: E=-\epsilon,\,0,\,\epsilon.

The average energy of the system is

\begin{equation}
\langle E \rangle=-\frac{2N\epsilon\,\sinh(\beta\,\epsilon)}{1+2\cosh(\beta\epsilon)}.
\end{equation}

Let me define \mathcal{E}=\langle E \rangle/N\epsilon. If I'm to write \beta=1/k_{_{B}}T in terms of this dimensionless energy \mathcal{E}, I'll arrive at the equation

\begin{equation}
\mathcal{E}+(\mathcal{E}+1)e^{\beta B}+(\mathcal{E}-1)e^{-\beta B}=0.
\end{equation}

I tried to solve this as a quadractic equation, obtaining

\begin{equation}
\beta = \frac{1}{B}\ln\left[\frac{-\mathcal{E}+\sqrt{4-3\mathcal{E}^{2}}}{2}\right].
\end{equation}

The first thing to observe is that we must have

\begin{equation}
\mathcal{E}^{2}<\frac{4}{3}
\end{equation}

for a real temperature to exist. Now, for a solution with negative temperature to exist, we have to have that

\begin{equation}
-\mathcal{E}+\sqrt{4-3\mathcal{E}^{2}}<2
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
-\mathcal{E}<1
\end{equation}

If \mathcal{E}&gt;0 this relation is always satisfied. If \mathcal{E}=-|\mathcal{E}|, then the condition reads |\mathcal{E}|&lt;1. This is the part I don't get. If |\mathcal{E}|&gt;1 then we have positive temperatures. But this means that

\begin{equation}
|\langle E \rangle| > N\epsilon
\end{equation}

and N\epsilon is the energy the system has if all N particles are in identical alignment with respect to the external magnetic field. It's the maximum energy possible. How can the average temperature be larger than the maximum possible?Thank you very much.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Your equation (3) is not quadratic. The average energy depends on the temperature, so the coefficients in equ 3 are not constants.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
9K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K