How to Modelize Column Buckling with Coupled Differential Equations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on modeling column buckling using a system of coupled differential equations. The equations presented are non-linear due to variable coefficients and the interaction of terms involving the slope angle, θ. Participants recommend starting with numerical methods to gain insights into the system before attempting an analytical solution. The Peano-Baker method is mentioned as a potential approach for solving linear differential equations, although the consensus leans towards numerical solutions for practical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coupled differential equations
  • Familiarity with numerical methods for differential equations
  • Knowledge of the Peano-Baker method for solving linear differential equations
  • Basic concepts of non-linear systems and variable coefficients
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore numerical methods for solving differential equations, such as the Runge-Kutta method
  • Research the Peano-Baker method and its applications in linear differential equations
  • Investigate techniques for simplifying non-linear equations
  • Learn about initial condition selection for numerical simulations in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and researchers involved in structural analysis, particularly those focusing on column stability and differential equation modeling.

tdcaupv
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have to modelize the buckling of a column and I've come up with this system:
N'(x) + N(x) \theta ' (x) \theta (x) - Q \theta ' (x) + f = 0
Q'(x) + N(x) \theta ' (x) + Q \theta ' (x) \theta (x) = 0

with f a constant

The coefficients (thetas) are not constants.
I've written it as X' = A X + f But I don't know how to diagonalize A since coefficients are not constants.

Thank You for helping me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, it's worse than that. Not only are the coefficients variable, but the second equation includes \theta \theta' so the equations are non-linear and matrix methods cannot be used at all.
 
edit
 
θ is a known function right?
 
Yes.
 
How complicated is θ?
 
Well, i don't know, I am a bit lost.
Actually, theta is my slope angle which is very small.
 
May I ask why you just don't solve it numerically? I mean really, he didn't say nothing about analytic solution else I'd keep my mouth shut. You know, numerical methods are perfectly fine for the real-world.

So if I may be the practical voice in here: work it first numerically even if you need an analytic solution just to get a handle on it, then do it analytically if you have to.
 
  • #10
First I need to solve it analytically. Maybe equations are not good. Maybe I should get simplier equations, i don't know ...
 
  • #11
No you don't even if you have to solve it analytically. You know if you're going to drive your truck in the dark without lights, it's a good idea to first walk the path with a flash light to see if there are any holes and stuf.

I'm tellin' you the right way to approach this: solve it first numerically even if you have to just dream-up initial conditions. Get a handle on it, then attempt to solve it analytically.

Also, I do not believe this is a non-linear system if \theta(x) is known. You effectively have:

\frac{dN}{dx}=-Ngh+Qh-f

\frac{dQ}{dx}=-Nh+Qhg

where g=g(x) and h=h(x) are known functions. Well there you go: I'm dreamin' up g and h, N(0) and Q(0) too, bingo-bango: Numeric solution in hand.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K