Coupled oscillator question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of coupled oscillators, specifically focusing on the eigenvalues and eigenvectors associated with the system. The normal frequencies are identified as ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{2m}}## and ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{3k}{2m}}##. The confusion arises regarding the elimination of the constant amplitude ##a_1## in the expression for the amplitude vector ##\vec a = (1, 2)##. It is clarified that the relative amplitudes are what matter, and the amplitudes can be scaled without affecting the physical interpretation of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with coupled oscillators and normal modes
  • Knowledge of harmonic motion and oscillation frequency formulas
  • Basic proficiency in matrix operations and determinants
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of eigenvalues for coupled oscillator systems
  • Learn about normalization of eigenvectors in physical systems
  • Explore the implications of amplitude ratios in coupled oscillators
  • Investigate the behavior of oscillators in different normal modes
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanical vibrations, engineers working with oscillatory systems, and anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of coupled oscillators.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
##(\vec K - \omega^2\vec M)\vec a = \vec 0##
The problem and solution is,
1713137644763.png

1713137669509.png

However, I am confused how they get ##\vec a = (1, 2)## (I convert from column vector to coordinate form of vector). I got ##\vec a = (a_1, a_2) = (a_1, 2a_1) = a_1(1, 2)## however, why did they eliminate the constant ##a_1##?

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • 1713137596149.png
    1713137596149.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 55
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a classic coupled oscillators problem. The solution involves finding the eigenvalues of the matrix, that is the values of ##\omega## which will make the determinant of the matrix equal to zero. That part is already done for you and you are given one value of normal frequency equal to ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac k {2m}}## (the other normal frequency is ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac {3k} {2m}}##).
Your job is to find the eigenvector that correspond to the normal frequency given. ##a_1## and ##a2## are amplitudes of, respectively, the first and the second mass and what really matters is not the absolute value of the amplitudes but their relative values. Your answer is correct, the amplitude of the second mass is twice the amplitude of the first mass and, they are moving in the same direction. However, the actual values of the amplitudes can be anything, 0 cm, 10 cm, etc., ##a_1## is not a constant, can be anything.
Incidently, if you were to use the other frequency, you would have found that the masses oscillate out of phase yet, the amplitude of the second mass is also double the first one.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
ChiralSuperfields said:
However, I am confused how they get ##\vec a = (1, 2)## (I convert from column vector to coordinate form of vector). I got ##\vec a = (a_1, a_2) = (a_1, 2a_1) = a_1(1, 2)## however, why did they eliminate the constant ##a_1##?
It's the ratio ##a_1/a_2## that counts. The normal modes are conventionally written as normalized column vectors. In this case, one would write $$\mathbf a =\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}
\begin{pmatrix}1 \\2\end{pmatrix}.$$
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K