Coupling constants with fractional dimensions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of coupling constants with fractional dimensions in quantum field theory (QFT). It highlights that traditional texts like Peskin & Schroeder and D. Tong's lecture notes assert that renormalizability requires coupling constants to possess correct dimensions, rendering scalar fields with interactions such as ##\phi^5## and ##\phi^6## uninteresting. The inquiry extends to whether fractional powers, such as ##\phi^{7/2}##, lead to unphysical behavior and questions the feasibility of constructing Feynman vertices with non-integer powers of scalar fields. The potential for fractional interactions to behave similarly to non-renormalizable ones is also examined.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with renormalization concepts in theoretical physics
  • Knowledge of scalar field interactions and their dimensional analysis
  • Basic grasp of Feynman diagrams and perturbation theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of fractional dimensions in quantum field theory
  • Study the renormalization process in non-renormalizable theories
  • Explore advanced scalar field theories with non-integer powers
  • Learn about the construction of Feynman vertices involving unconventional interactions
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, quantum field theorists, and advanced students interested in the nuances of coupling constants and their dimensionality in QFT.

hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
607
Most QFT texts, such as Peskin&Schroeder and D. Tong's lecture notes, contain a mention that the renormalizability of an interacting theory requires the coupling constants to have correct dimensions, making scalar fields with ##\phi^5 , \phi^6, \dots## interactions uninteresting. Maybe there are similar limitations for vector and spinor field interactions, but someone more familiar with QFT must answer that.

Now, if instead of an integer power of the scalar field, I make a field equation that has something like ##\phi^{7/2}## or similar in it, does this lead to some kind of unphysical behavior too? In theories of physics, you don't really see constants of nature that have fractional powers of kilogram or second in their units (not sure why). Is this kind of a fractional interaction equivalent to a non-renormalizable one because the term with fractional order can be expanded to a power series with arbitrarily high integer powers of the field variable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you build a Feynman vertex out of 3,5 scalar neutral particles, such as Higgs bosons? How would you do it, draw 3 full lines and the 4th reduced to half length?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hilbert2
A perturbation expansion containing products of three creation/annihilation operators with one square-root creation/annihilation operator would definitely be a bit difficult, and maybe it would cause problems similar to when you try to take the square root of the Klein-Gordon operator. It's just not immediately obvious to me that there's no way to do that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
728
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K