Relevant interactions in quantum field theory

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
For a ##\phi^{3}## quantum field theory, the interaction term is ##\displaystyle{\frac{g}{3!}\phi^{3}}##, where ##g## is the coupling constant.

The mass dimension of the coupling constant ##g## is ##1##, which means that ##\displaystyle{\frac{g}{E}}## is dimensionless.

Therefore, ##\displaystyle{\frac{g}{3!}\phi^{3}}## is a small pertubation at high energies ##E \gg g##, but a large perturbation at low energies ##E \ll g##.

Terms with this behavior are called relevant because they’re most relevant at low energies.

However, I do not understand why the interaction term is called relevant if we cannot use perturbation theory at low energies (where the term ##\displaystyle{\frac{g}{3!}\phi^{3}}## is a large pertubation). Is it because quantum field theory is only applicable in the relativistic limit, where ##E \gg g## and the perturbation is small ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The philosophy behind this terminology is that all field theories are only effective theories, which means that they are valid only at large distances (low energies). If a contribution is relevant, it means that it is not negligible. But it does not mean that it is not sufficiently small for application of perturbation theory. For instance, ##\alpha=1/137## is small but not negligible.