Course advice for Theoretical Physics at Cambridge University

AI Thread Summary
Choosing between the Natural Science Tripos and the Mathematical Tripos for theoretical physics at Cambridge University depends on the desired balance of mathematics and practical physics experience. The Mathematical Tripos focuses more on theoretical concepts without laboratory work, while the Natural Science Tripos includes practical components. The "Maths with Physics" option allows students to experience both curricula, providing insight into teaching methods before making a final decision. It is advisable to start with the Maths with Physics option and consider transferring to Natural Sciences after the first year. Ultimately, the choice should align with personal interests in mathematical rigor and practical physics application.
Raman5656s
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I want to apply to Cambridge University for theoretical physics for undergraduate degree.I want to ask that should i chose natural science tripos or mathematical tripos for theoretical physics?

I am also aware about the option(b) 'maths with physics' in mathematical tripos,but it is a one year degree course,after that should i stay in mathematical tripos or natural science tripos? Also what is the difference between the physics taught in natsci course vs physics taught in mathematical tripos.

As my passion lies in both mathematical rigor but i also does not want to know less physics(for theoretical physics ,as being in mathematical tripos) also i know that natsci does have enough mathematical rigor. Again repeating -physics taught in natsci course vs physics taught in mathematical tripos? Main concern is:which course will we better for theoretical physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Raman5656s said:
I want to apply to Cambridge University for theoretical physics for undergraduate degree.I want to ask that should i chose natural science tripos or mathematical tripos for theoretical physics?

I did study Mathematics at Cambridge, although that was 20 years ago so my personal experience is likely not of use to you. The main difference is that the applied mathematics/theoretical physics courses on the Mathematics Tripos do not contain any element of practical laboratory work, whilst the physics courses on the Natural Science Tripos do. In later years there is significant overlap, with students on both triposes being able to take courses taught by either DAMTP, DoP or IoA (Institute of Astronomy).

Mathematics with Physics is perhaps the obvious choice. The effect of this option is that Paper 4 of Part I of the Mathematics Tripos (Number and Sets / Dynamics and Relativity) is replaced by the Physics paper from Part I of Natrual Sciences, and the corresponding lecture courses are replaced* by the whole of the physics course, including practical laboratory work. It will therefore give you experience of the teaching methods of both triposes, which will help inform your decision as to what you do subsequently.

*This is not a 1-1 substitution; the physics course takes more time than the two maths courses.

I am also aware about the option(b) 'maths with physics' in mathematical tripos,but it is a one year degree course,after that should i stay in mathematical tripos or natural science tripos?

That is, I suspect, not a decision you can sensibly make until you have completed the first year, and nor will your College expect you to make it until then.

Bear in mind that which course you initially apply for will determine who interviews you and which STEP papers you are asked to take as a condition of your offer.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top