Courses: Which one to choose for CMP?

  • Context: Courses 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Courses
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decision-making process regarding course selection for a student interested in condensed matter physics (CMP). The options are "Analytical Mechanics," "Introduction to Nuclear- and Particle Physics," and "Programming for Physicists." The consensus is that while both Analytical Mechanics and Programming for Physicists are valuable, Analytical Mechanics is deemed more fundamental. Due to scheduling conflicts with the CMP course, the student is considering self-studying Analytical Mechanics while enrolling in the Computational course.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of condensed matter physics (CMP)
  • Familiarity with analytical mechanics principles
  • Basic knowledge of numerical methods in programming
  • Ability to self-study complex physics topics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research self-study resources for Analytical Mechanics
  • Explore computational physics techniques and tools
  • Investigate numerical methods relevant to physics applications
  • Review course materials for Programming for Physicists
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on condensed matter physics, who are evaluating course options and self-study strategies.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi all.

I have to make a decision in ~1 month, whether I want a course in "Analytical Mechanics", "Introduction to Nuclear- and Particle Physics" and "Programming for Physicists".

The thing is, I wish to work in condensed matter physics (whether that may be computional, theoretical or experimental), which is why I have already ruled out "Introduction to Nuclaer- and Particle Physics".

This leaves the last two. Which ones do you think will benefit me most in the long run?


Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Analytical mechanics is very fundamental and important. Programming for physicists is probably a numerical methods class. Numerical methods are very important, but for the most part they're easy to learn ideas that can be self-taught and then implemented quickly. You'll need to learn both at some point, but since analytical mechanics is more fundamental I'd say to go for that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21
Well, the thing is that I will also be following a course in CMP, and apparently the lectures of the CMP-course and Analytical Mechanics-course will be in the same days and same hours - so I have to choose which lectures I should go to! (This is not the case with the Computational-course)

And based on this, the Analytical Mechanics course will be self-studied in some way. This is why I thought last night that perhaps I should self-study Analytical-Mechanics, and take the Computational-course.

But do you think this is possible (i.e. possible to self-study Analytical Mechanics)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K