Covariant vs Canonical Formalism

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Quantizer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Covariant
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the comparison between covariant and canonical formalisms in the context of loop quantum gravity. Participants explore the implications, advantages, and disadvantages of each approach, seeking to understand their relevance and application in theoretical physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the preference for covariant formalism over canonical formalism in loop quantum gravity, seeking a layman-friendly explanation.
  • There is a question regarding whether the general public understands the terms "covariant" and "canonical," indicating a potential barrier to comprehension.
  • One participant asks for a pedagogical explanation of the advantages of the covariant approach compared to the canonical approach in loop quantum gravity.
  • Another participant references Feynman's ability to simplify complex concepts, suggesting that clarity in communication is valuable in teaching physics.
  • One participant argues against the notion that any formalism is universally preferred, stating that each has its own advantages and disadvantages depending on the specific goals of the inquiry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the preference of formalisms, with some suggesting a preference for covariant formalism while others argue that the choice depends on context and specific applications. No consensus is reached regarding which formalism is superior.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of understanding and communicating advanced concepts in physics, particularly for those outside the field. There are indications of missing assumptions regarding the audience's familiarity with technical terminology.

Quantizer
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Why is a covariant formalism preferred over a canonical formalism in loop quantum gravity, in simple layman terms
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does the usual layman understand what is meant by covariant and canonical?
 
What are the advantages of covariant approach over canonical approach for loop quantum gravity, pedagogical answer please
 
Ultrafastped, Feynman was admired specifically because he could articulate the most simplest responses to all sorts of profound questions in physics, and for that reason he was a great teacher and The Physicists Physcist
 
I would not say that any formalism is preferred. Each formalism has several advantages and disadvantages, so it depends what you want to do exactly.
 

Similar threads

Graduate General Covariance in Quantum Field Theory
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Graduate Heisenberg Picture Formalism: Rewriting Operators in Covariance
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Witten’s paper: "A Note On The Canonical Formalism for Gravity" LQG
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
Graduate Number of particles in canonical ensemble
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Graduate Covariance of equal time commutation relations
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Graduate Quantum statistical canonical formalism to find ground state at T
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Graduate Why do we use covariant formulation in classical electrodynamics?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Graduate Covariant form of Maxwell's (inhomogeneous) equations (in GR)
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
High School A covariant vs contravariant vector?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Undergrad Canonical quantization of Ashtekar's new variables
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K