Microcanonical vs. Canonical Partition Functions: What's the Difference?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
soumobrata
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
What is the difference between micro canonical Partition function and canonical Partition function?
Is the mathematical expression of the above two Partition function are same?
If it is then why??
[emoji29]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I understand it, the various types of ensembles differ in what is held constant, and what is allowed to change (by exchanging something with the environment--energy, or particles, or whatever). The microcanonical ensemble holds the following quantities fixed:
  1. Total Energy
  2. Volume
  3. Number of particles (of each type)
For a canonical ensemble, instead of holding the total energy constant, the temperature is held constant.

The expressions for the partition function definitely are different in the two cases. The canonical partition function, [itex]Z(N,V,T)[/itex] is a function of T, V, and N, while the microcanonical partition function, [itex]\Omega(N,V,E)[/itex] is a function of E, V and N. The microcanonical partition function is usually called the "density of states". They are related to thermodynamic quantities:

[itex]Z = e^{-A/kT}[/itex] where [itex]A[/itex] is the Helmholtz free energy, [itex]A = E - TS[/itex].
[itex]\Omega = e^{S/k}[/itex] where [itex]S[/itex] is the entropy
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: soumobrata
Thanks i will show u a problem tomorrow...then my doubts wiil be clear!