Crab Nebula Pulsar: Angular Acceleration Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skomatth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulsar Rotating
Click For Summary
A pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star that emits a radio beam, with the Crab Nebula pulsar having a rotation period of T=0.033 seconds, increasing at a rate of 1.26 x 10^-5 seconds per year. The discussion revolves around calculating the pulsar's angular acceleration, questioning whether T(t)=2pi/w(t) is a valid approach. It is noted that the slow rate of change in the period means the angular speed remains nearly constant during one rotation. The emission of pulses from the magnetic poles may occasionally lead to receiving two pulses per revolution, but this is considered irrelevant to the main problem. Understanding the relationship between period and angular speed is crucial for solving the angular acceleration.
Skomatth
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
A pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star that emits a radio beam the way a lighthouse emits a light beam. We receive a radio pulse for each rotation of the star. The period T of rotation is found by measuring the time between pulses. The pulsar in the Crab nebula has a period of rotation of T=.033s that is increasing at the rate of 1.26 x 10^-5 s/y

a)What is the pulsar's angular acceleration?
I know that T=2pi/w when omega is constant. Does it make sense to that that T(t)=2pi/w(t) ? If this is correct then I can get the answer, but even if it is correct I'm not sure why it works.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't do the math. Just remember that the beams are emitted from the magnetic poles of the star, so you can expect that once in a while the orientation will be such that we receive two pulses per revolution. I don't know if any currently known ones are like that, though.
 
Judging by the context of the problem this is irrelevant.
 
Skomatth said:
I know that T=2pi/w when omega is constant. Does it make sense to that that T(t)=2pi/w(t) ?
Makes sense to me. Note that the rate of change of the period is so slow that for all practical purposes the angular speed hardly changes during one revolution.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
727
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K