Crazy orientation of solid oblong

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter julian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orientation Solid
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the orientation and projection of a solid oblong, specifically whether it can be positioned to appear half its length and width while maintaining certain geometric properties. The scope includes conceptual reasoning and technical explanations related to perspective and projection in geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of claims that a solid oblong can be oriented to appear half its dimensions, suggesting that the idea may be unreasonable.
  • Another participant proposes that the perception of reduced dimensions could be explained through perspective and projection, providing an example involving tilting an oblong block at an angle.
  • A further contribution clarifies that while it might be possible to project the front face of an object to appear reduced in height, achieving a simultaneous reduction in both height and width while maintaining right angles is problematic.
  • One participant discusses the mathematical implications of rotating the object and how different definitions of width in the projection could lead to varying interpretations of the object's dimensions.
  • There is a question raised about whether the original intent was to maintain the rectangular shape of the object, which adds complexity to the discussion of transformations and projections.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of achieving the claimed orientation and projection of the solid oblong. There is no consensus on whether the proposed transformations can yield the desired visual effects while adhering to geometric constraints.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of width and height in projections, as well as the assumptions regarding the angles maintained during rotations. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps involved in achieving the claimed projections.

julian
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
861
Reaction score
366
I got these people trying to say that you can orientate a solid oblong so that it looks half the length and width with the only residule effect that it looks like it is slanted sideways a bit. Does anyone know what it is or are they crazy. I think they might be crazy. How do you explain this to them in simple terms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Erg - it may make sense in terms of perspective and projection.
Do you have an example?

I could tilt an oblong block (a book say) back so it's surface makes an angle 30deg to horizontal ... to an observer looking along the horizontal, it will kind-of have half it's full height. (projection to the vertical would be sin(30)=1/2=0.5) This would also bring the bottom into view - the bottom face would be tilted 60deg to the horizontal and therefore the width will not appear to be half (sin(60)=√3/2=0.87).
 
Last edited:
Something like a book viewed from a camera. But they want to angle the book so that the book looks half the height AND half the width (not talking about halving the width of the bottom face but the book itself) at the same time and while keeping the angle between the top edge and side edge close to 90 degrees. when image is viewed from the computer screen. You can't do that can you?
 
Last edited:
If all you are interested in is the projected dimensions of the front pane then I would say that is kinda possible ... the resulting projection would be a diamond.

If I put the book so it is face-on ... center it on (0,0,0) with the x-axis to the left, y-axis up, and z pointing at the observer.
Height h is along y, width w is along x, and thickness t is along z. But we are only concerned with height and width - so ignore thickness.
We are interested in projections h' and w' in the x-y plane... so we are not worried about perspective that a camera would introduce.

If I rotate the book 60deg about the x axis, it's projection in the x-y plane will be w'=w, and h'=h/2

Can you rotate the already rotated figure so that w'=w/2 now, without changing h'?

You can certainly can just rotate it by 60deg about the y-axis to get w'=w/2 if you define w' to be the horizontal distance across the projection.
(The projection of the projection onto the x-axis.)
Defining w' to be the perpendicular distance between opposite sloping sides (like you'd normally do for a rhombus) - you'd need a different rotation to make w'=w/2.

But does it still make sense to call it a book of half width? Did "they" intend the book to remain rectangular (all angles at the vertices to be 90deg)?

Have you asked "these people" to tell you what transformation does what they claim?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K