Creating a Vector Field from a 3D Parametric Equation

Click For Summary
To create a vector field from the 3D parametric equation [x,y,z]=[r*cos(u),r*sin(u),a*u], users are exploring options primarily using Grapher on Mac and Mathematica. The equation describes a helix, but there is no singular method to convert it into a vector field; the desired characteristics of the field must be clarified. Users are advised that if the goal is simply to visualize the helix, the current parametric form is sufficient for plotting without additional calculations. Mathematica's VectorPlot3D can be used for more complex visualizations, but it may not yield results in all cases. Understanding the specific requirements for the vector field will guide the approach taken.
theobserver
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am trying to turn a 3D parametric equation into a vector field for an experiment, but I am not having much luck. [x,y,z]=[r*cos(u),r*sin(u),a*u] is the equation, I'm using grapher on the Mac. I want it all going in a helix, which is what the equation is for.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite an answer to your question I'm afraid, but just in case it's any help, you can plot a vector field like this in Mathematica:

Code:
VectorPlot3D[{Norm[{x, y, z}]*Cos[ArcTan[x, y]], 
  Norm[{x, y, z}]*Cos[ArcTan[x, y]], ArcTan[x, y]}, {x, -9, 
  9}, {y, -9, 9}, {z, -9, 9}]

Wolfram Alpha didn't do anything when I tried it there just now, although it does plot the parametric equation with

Code:
ParametricPlot3D[{Cos[u],Sin[u],u}, {u, 0, 9}]

(taking r = a = 1).
 
theobserver said:
I am trying to turn a 3D parametric equation into a vector field for an experiment, but I am not having much luck. [x,y,z]=[r*cos(u),r*sin(u),a*u] is the equation, I'm using grapher on the Mac. I want it all going in a helix, which is what the

Hello again :)

Maybe it would help to explain the purpose a bit clearer. There's no unique way to convert a helix to a vector field. What do you want the vector field to look like? Should it fill all space or just exist on the curve? Should it be tangent to the curve at points on the curve?

If you simply want to plot the equation directly to get a picture of the helix then you don't need any extra math, the equation is already in an ideal form for parametric plotting. Just look up the manual for Grapher, equivalent to Rasel's ParametricPlot3D example.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K