Undergrad Creation and annihilation operator commutation confusion

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the commutation relation of creation and annihilation operators in Quantum Field Theory, specifically addressing the confusion surrounding the equation [\hat{a_i},\hat{a_j}^\dagger]=\delta{ij}. The original poster grapples with the implications of this relation when applied to a single particle state, expecting a result of 1 but instead obtaining 0. A key clarification is provided that the application of the creation operator actually scales the state by a factor of √2, which resolves the discrepancy. This highlights the importance of understanding the normalization factors involved in quantum states. The conversation emphasizes the nuances of operator behavior in quantum mechanics.
43arcsec
Messages
37
Reaction score
4
In Quantum Field Theory by Lancaster, equation 3.14

$$ [\hat{a_i},\hat{a_j}^\dagger]=\delta{ij}$$
is introduced as "we define". Yes, example 2.1, where the creation and annihilation operators applied to harmonic operator states, there is a nice simple proof that this is true (although instead of the dirac delta, it's just 1.)

The trouble I am having is that these are operators and they have to operate on something. The identity above says that the commutator must be true no matter what it operates on. Let's say the commutator acts on a single particle in state |i> and for this example, let i=j, so we should get 1. Then we'd have:

$$ \hat{a_i}\hat{a_i}^\dagger|i> - \hat{a_i}^\dagger\hat{a_i}|i>$$
After the rightmost operators act we should get:

$$ \hat{a_i}|2i> - \hat{a_i}^\dagger|0>$$

Here my |2i> represents a state with 2 particles in state i (there was one there to start, and the creation operator created another). Letting the remaining operators act we should get:

$$|i> - |i> = 0$$

I was expecting 1, not 0.

Thanks for looking.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
43arcsec said:
After the rightmost operators act we should get:

Not quite: You are assuming that ##{a}^{\dagger}_i | i > = | 2i >##; but actually ##{a}^{\dagger}_i | i > = \sqrt{2} | 2i >##. (Make sure you understand why this is the case.) Similarly, ##a_i | 2i > = \sqrt{2} | i >##. The two factors of ##\sqrt{2}## applied to the first term should make things work out.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Got it. Thanks Peter!
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
700
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
626
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K