Creation and annihilation operators

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the manipulation of creation and annihilation operators in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the expression (a^† a)^2 and its equivalence to a^† a^† a a + a^† a. The original poster presents their attempts to expand and simplify the expression using the definitions of the operators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various attempts to manipulate the expression (a^† a)^2, with some suggesting the use of the relationship between a a^† and a^† a. Questions arise regarding notation and the implications of sign differences in the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications on notation and relationships between the operators. There is a focus on ensuring understanding of the mathematical relationships involved, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion arising from notation and the need to clarify the definitions of the operators involved. There is also mention of the identity matrix in the context of the calculations.

Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi all

Homework Statement


Show:

(a^\dagger a)^2=a^\dagger a^\dagger a a +a^\dagger a

wheres:
a= \lambda x +i \gamma p
a^\dagger= \lambda x -i \gamma p

Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I haven't got much.

I just tried to use the stuff given, put it into my equation and solve it, but I don't get to the right side.

I calculated a+a first

a^\dagger a ={\lambda}^2x^2 + \frac {1}{2} I + \gamma^2 p^2

But when I now try to calculate the square of that term I get lost. If I square it I get to:

(a^\dagger a)^2= \lambda^4x^4+\gamma^4p^4 +\lambda^2 \gamma^2 (x^2p^2+p^2x^2)-\lambda^2 x^2 -\gamma^2 p^2 +\frac 1 4 ICan anyone help me with this? I don't know what to do now/ If I'm on the right way.

Thanks for your help

edit: I is the identity matrix
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(a^{+}a)^{2}
= a^{=}aa^{+}a
=a^{+}(aa^{+})a.

Now try to get aa^{+} in terms of a^{+}a.
 
grzz said:
(a^{+}a)^{2}
= a^{=}aa^{+}a
=a^{+}(aa^{+})a.

Now try to get aa^{+} in terms of a^{+}a.

what does your a^= mean? I don't know this sign.

Thanks for your help

edit:

aa^\dagger=\lambda^2 x^2 + \frac 1 2 I +\gamma^2 p^2
 
I used the plus sign instead of the dagger sign.

You are supposed to see a with + as a superscript wherever you see a with ^ as a superscript.

Sorry for the trouble in the notation used.
 
I see a = not a + but I think it's just a typing mistake.

so what you mean

...= a^\dagger a a^\dagger a=a^\dagger (aa^\dagger) a

is that what you meant?

I calculated my aa+ (see my post) and a+a is the same, though there's a minus infront of the I
 
Lindsayyyy said:
I calculated my aa+ (see my post) and a+a is the same, though there's a minus infront of the I
"The same"? That difference in sign makes all the difference. Can you now relate aa^{\dagger} to a^{\dagger}a?
 
With "the same" I meant the rest of the terms. Unlucky word choice from my side I guess.
What do you mean with "can you now relate aa+ to a+a"
do you mean that I should calculate (aa^\dagger) (a^\dagger a)

thanks for the help
 
No, I meant the relationship between aa^{\dagger} and a^{\dagger}a ie express one of them in terms of the other.
 
Yes that is what I meant.

Allow me to use a+ to mean a with + as a superscript.

So aa+ = a+a + 1.

Now one more step.
 
  • #10
Do you mean something like

a^\dagger a = 2\lambda^2 x^2 +2 \gamma^2 x^2 -a a^\dagger

edit: nevermind, fail lol.

I guess you meant what grzz just said. I have to eat dinner now. I'll try later or tomorrow and come back when I have further questions (I'm pretty sure I will have some :( )

Thanks so far for the help guys.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K