Creativity in Physics: Berkeley vs IIT

Click For Summary
Creativity in physics involves more than just thinking outside the box; it encompasses the ability to analyze problems deeply and question their fundamental aspects. While IIT students may excel in solving physics problems, Berkeley students are perceived as more creative due to their focus on understanding and reimagining questions. True genius in physics is characterized by a blend of creativity and technical skill, allowing individuals to see the broader implications of theories rather than just the details. Creativity is viewed as a vital tool in physics, akin to mathematical and philosophical techniques, and can be cultivated, though some individuals may possess a natural talent for it. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the balance between creativity and technical proficiency in advancing scientific understanding.
ZPower
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
What does it mean to be creative in Physics? Does it mean to just think outside the box? What does that mean in physics?

For example, IIT physics students are better at solving physics question than Berkeley students, but many claim that Cal students are more creative, bcs. Berkeley students have less questions, and thus more time to think about a question, analyze it, understand it, and question its limits, change the problem, ex make the block on an incline spin, etc.

So are Berkeley students more creative?

And what does it mean to be creative in physics?

Should a true genius be more creative than able to solve all the details in a physics question? Better to see the whole big picture rather than all the details.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Creativity is a tool, just like math and philosophy. It can over-emphasized as well as under-emphasized.

While we all realize there's an extent to which creativity might be discouraged in science (depending on what you think of when you hear 'creativity') there's plenty of mathematical techniques and lab techniques that all serve the same function, and may be used in different combinations for optimization of different aspects of an experiment (or theory).

Also, the nomenclature we use when writing our papers (tortuosity!), the way we describe things and understand them in an experiential way (periodic table), the way we prefer to model things (Feynman diagrams) all required a certain amount of creativity.
 
hmm, i never thought of creativity as a tool, but i can actually see that quite easily. I think that creativity like other tools can also be learned, but some are more talented at that than others.

True geniuses i think are excellent at being creative, rather than mainstream, because there are many people in mainstream who can do the details of the problem and the math of it, but a geniuses like Einstein or Feynman can understand the math, perhaps not do it, but most importantly, they can see above it and ask questions and make theories.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
795
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K