Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Crisis of Notation, italic or roman subscripts?

Tags:
  1. Apr 5, 2015 #1
    From the wikipedia article Physical Quantity
    I'm having trouble deciphering the difference here between when roman or italic is appropriate.

    Any further guidance?

    Thank you.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 5, 2015 #2
    My understanding is -
    The quantity is always in italics.
    Name reference - subscript refers to the concept or entity (usually with an abbr.); written upright.
    Quantity reference - subscript refers to under what condition measurement was taken (with a symbol for the quantity taken as constant); written in italics.

    Basically, accepted symbols are in italics; abbreviations are not.
     
  4. Apr 5, 2015 #3
    Notice, Ashiataka, that the choice is between upright or italic, not Roman or italic. Roman seems to be the conventional font, and it may either remain upright or be italicized.
     
  5. Apr 5, 2015 #4

    DrClaude

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    From Wikipedia:
     
  6. Apr 5, 2015 #5

    DrClaude

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I concur with Enigman. Note that Physical Review has a different rule: all single-letter subscripts must be italic, even if they don't refer to a quantity. For example, the initial time could be noted ##t_\mathrm{i}##, except in Physical Review where it must be ##t_i##.
     
  7. Apr 5, 2015 #6
    I stand corrected. I thought Roman was a font that could be left upright, italicized, bolded, or underlined like any font.
     
  8. Apr 6, 2015 #7

    BobG

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Yes, Roman, like any text, can be italicized on a computer. That's not the same as an Italic font, which can similarly be modified into an upright Italic font (one of the options when you need to italicize something in the middle of a text that's already italicized).

    With computers and tons of fonts, you can italicize anything with that meaning "slanted letters" for a lot of the fonts.

    In the old days of typesetting, italics was its own font and still is, even if not as significant anymore in normal text. Who the heck wants to actually change fonts all the time when using slanted letters is simpler and almost as effective.

    Back in the days I used a typewriter, I just plain hated italicized text in a paper. I had to insert two blocks of wood, just the write size, under the two right feet of the typewriter in order to get just the right slant for the italicized letters.
     
  9. Apr 6, 2015 #8
    I guess my sense of it came completely from internet usage, and I never ran across the history.
    Oh, the right side! I never had any luck with this because I was always blocking up the left side! My reasoning was that friction should prevent the bottom of the letters from moving while the tops fell to the right.


     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Crisis of Notation, italic or roman subscripts?
Loading...