Ranku
- 433
- 18
As a matter of fact I also got into an argument with him about an error, and while he acknowledged the error privately, he didn’t correct it in his blog.Vanadium 50 said:Ethan Siegel is not a reliable source. On multiple occasions he has made an error, I reported it to him, he acknowledged the error, and then didn't correct it. He writes "sciency entertainment" not science.
In any event, I think this thread can be closed. You asked a question, got an answer, and did not accept the answer. What purpose is there in going around again and again and again?
Anyways, that’s besides the point. I didn’t say I didn‘t accept the answer…I am just exploring the issue. I was about to request closing the thread myself, since someone else is extending it unnecessarily.