Undergrad Cross Section & Mass: Is There a Relation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between WIMP-nucleon cross sections and dark matter particle mass, specifically referencing a cross section of 1.2x10-47 cm2 at 1 TeV/c2. It concludes that while there is a correlation between cross section and mass, no universal formula applies to all processes. The analysis of direct dark matter detection experiments, such as LUX, indicates that heavier dark matter particles require a lower production cross-section due to the finite amount of dark matter in the universe. Additionally, the discussion highlights the complexities of modeling dark matter interactions and the challenges in distinguishing signals from background noise in experimental data.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles) and their role in dark matter theory.
  • Familiarity with cross-section calculations in particle physics.
  • Knowledge of direct dark matter detection methodologies, particularly LUX experiment protocols.
  • Basic principles of nuclear recoil and its significance in particle interactions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the LUX dark matter detection experiment's findings and methodologies.
  • Explore the implications of dark matter particle mass on cross-section calculations.
  • Study the dynamics of dark matter halos in galaxies and their influence on detection experiments.
  • Investigate the differences between weak force interactions and other forces in the context of dark matter.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and researchers involved in dark matter studies, particularly those focused on particle interactions and detection methodologies.

  • #31
Vanadium 50 said:
Ethan Siegel is not a reliable source. On multiple occasions he has made an error, I reported it to him, he acknowledged the error, and then didn't correct it. He writes "sciency entertainment" not science.

In any event, I think this thread can be closed. You asked a question, got an answer, and did not accept the answer. What purpose is there in going around again and again and again?
As a matter of fact I also got into an argument with him about an error, and while he acknowledged the error privately, he didn’t correct it in his blog.
Anyways, that’s besides the point. I didn’t say I didn‘t accept the answer…I am just exploring the issue. I was about to request closing the thread myself, since someone else is extending it unnecessarily.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ranku said:
... since someone else is extending it unnecessarily.

In this case, I thank everybody for their participation and lock the thread.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
729
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K