I CTC on FLRW cosmological models

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the existence of Closed Timelike Curves (CTCs) in Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) cosmological models, concluding that they do not possess CTCs as cosmological time always increases along future-directed timelike curves. Examples of spacetimes with CTCs, such as the Kerr interior, Gödel, and Tipler cylinder, are mentioned, but none are considered plausible cosmological models. It is emphasized that metrics used for modeling actual physical systems are globally hyperbolic and therefore cannot have CTCs. The Kerr metric's CTCs are confined to the inner horizon, which is not regarded as a realistic representation of a black hole's interior. The consensus is that the actual structure of a rotating black hole is likely different from the Kerr model.
cianfa72
Messages
2,852
Reaction score
302
TL;DR
About the existence of CTC in FLRW models
The subject of this thread is about the existence of Closed Timelike Curves (CTC) in FLRW models. FLRW models have topology ##\mathbb R^4## or ##\mathbb S^3 \times \mathbb R##.

What about their metric? Do they have any CTC ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. The cosmological time ##t## always increases along future-directed timelike curves.
 
Orodruin said:
No. The cosmological time ##t## always increases along future-directed timelike curves.
Ah ok. Which are examples of spacetime metric that have CTC? Are they a reasonable cosmological model ?
 
Kerr interior. Gödel. Tipler cylinder. There are probably others. None of them that I'm aware of are plausible cosmological spacetimes.
 
cianfa72 said:
Do they have any CTC ?
No metrics that are used for modeling actual physical systems have CTCs. All such metrics are globally hyperbolic, and a globally hyperbolic spacetime cannot have any CTCs. (Indeed, even spacetimes satisfying much weaker conditions cannot have any CTCs. The full gory details are in Hawking & Ellis.)
 
PeterDonis said:
No metrics that are used for modeling actual physical systems have CTCs.
Does that mean we don't regard the Kerr metric as plausible? Or just the bit near the ring singularity where CTCs exist?
 
Ibix said:
Does that mean we don't regard the Kerr metric as plausible? Or just the bit near the ring singularity where CTCs exist?
Yes, the CTCs in Kerr are only inside the inner horizon, and since the inner horizon is a Cauchy horizon, even if one has a spacetime that one knows to be Kerr everywhere outside the inner horizon, one cannot claim that it is Kerr inside the inner horizon. The general view among relativity physicists seems to be that the actual interior of a rotating black hole will not even contain a Kerr inner horizon, but will have some other structure that, causally speaking, looks more like Schwarzschild.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K