Current Research on Communication Between Universes?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around current research related to communication between universes within the framework of multiverse theory. Participants explore various interpretations of communication, the implications of multiverse theories, and the search for observational evidence of interactions between universes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about ongoing research into communication between universes, expressing interest in data collection related to this topic.
  • Another participant clarifies that communication may be interpreted differently, suggesting that observational evidence for multiple universes interacting with our own is a more scientific approach, referencing attempts to find signatures in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB).
  • Some participants question the definition of communication, arguing that if another universe could be communicated with, it might not be considered a separate universe.
  • There is a discussion about multiverse theories requiring universes to be causally disconnected, with some participants noting that if they were not, it would imply they are part of the same universe.
  • Roger Penrose's theories are mentioned, with one participant suggesting he may have proposed that artifacts in the CMB could originate from a previous universe, while others express skepticism about his ideas.
  • One participant highlights that recent work on eternal inflation in the CMB has not yielded evidence for such phenomena, referencing specific studies and their findings.
  • Another participant humorously compares the discussion to the historical claims of canals on Mars, indicating skepticism about the validity of the claims being made.
  • A later post humorously references Stephen King or Stephen Hawking in relation to research on communication between universes, though the participant is uncertain about the details.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of skepticism and curiosity regarding the concept of communication between universes. There is no consensus on the validity of the ideas presented, and multiple competing views remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific interpretations of multiverse theory and the nature of communication, which may not be universally accepted. The discussion also reflects varying degrees of skepticism towards the ideas proposed by notable physicists.

Mandy mae
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I will spare all the background, and simply as my question.

Does anyone know of any current research being done on communication between universes in relation to multiverse theory?

Laugh at you will at the concept.

I am currently collecting data and baselines for evaluating occurrences, and was hoping to touch base with others who are studying this as well.
 
Space news on Phys.org
This depends on whether you mean communication in the sense that physicists might use it - "does there exist any observational evidence for multiple universes (in the sense of eternal inflation) interacting with our own?", and you do see stuff about looking for signatures in the CMB reasonably often. (but most people criticize at those attempts - if you look closely at Gaussian noise, you can see anything) IIRC it was Penrose who was doing that first. Some different work on the same kind of thing can be found in papers here http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.1995 and http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.3667

You also occassionaly see papers like this: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0311014 I'm not qualified to speak to the substance of that paper though (and I've only read the abstract).

On the other hand if you mean communication in the lay-person sense "can you hear voices from an alternate earth?", then no. Really, not. And PF isn't the place to talk about crank things like that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Torbjorn_L
Things that we can communicate with are by definition within our observable universe. So, if we could communicate with another universe, in what sense would it be another universe and not just part of ours?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Simon Bridge and Torbjorn_L
Multiverse theories generally require other universes to be causally disconnected. Were they not, they would necessarily be an extension, as bapowell noted.
 
While it rather blurs the line between multi and causally connected, if Roger Penrose is correct there may be artifacts in the CMB from some previous Universe... or he could just be "channeling" Percival Lowell. :P
 
That is ludicrous. Not the first time Penrose has dove off the deep end. The guy is brilliant, but, eccentric.
 
Chronos said:
That is ludicrous. Not the first time Penrose has dove off the deep end. The guy is brilliant, but, eccentric.

It's not just Penrose. There has been some later work that was perhaps a bit more thought through, on looking for evidence of eternal inflation in the CMB - see the first two links I provided upthread, or this blog post summarizing the work from Sean Carroll's blog. The tl'dr is that they didn't find any evidence:

"Cutting to the chase, we were first able to use simulated CMB data containing bubble collisions to rule out a range of parameter space as inconsistent with WMAP data. As it turned out, the existence of a temperature discontinuity at the boundary of the disc greatly increases our ability to make a detection. We did not find any circular temperature discontinuities in the WMAP data."
 
Chronos said:
That is ludicrous. Not the first time Penrose has dove off the deep end. The guy is brilliant, but, eccentric.

Aye. Thus the comparison to "canals on Mars".
 
Mandy mae said:
Does anyone know of any current research being done on communication between universes in relation to multiverse theory?

Laugh at you will at the concept.
I vaguely recall reading Stephen King has done some research in that direction. Or maybe it was Stephen Hawking. Not sure...Stephen something
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bapowell and phinds

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K