MHB Curvature and torsion on a helix

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the curvature and torsion of a right circular helix parameterized by \(x(t) = R\cos(\omega t)\), \(y(t) = R\sin(\omega t)\), and \(z(t) = v_0t\). The curvature is derived as \(\frac{1}{\rho} = \frac{R\omega^2}{R^2\omega^2 + v_0^2}\). The unit tangent vector \(\hat{\mathbf{u}}\) is expressed in terms of the helix parameters, leading to the calculation of the curvature. The discussion also touches on the torsion, represented as \(\tau = -\mathbf{n} \cdot \frac{d \mathbf{b}}{ds}\), where \(\mathbf{t}\), \(\mathbf{n}\), and \(\mathbf{b}\) are defined as the unit tangent, principal normal, and binormal vectors, respectively. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical relationships between these vectors in the context of the helix's geometry.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Consider the case of a right circular helical curve with parameterization \(x(t) = R\cos(\omega t)\), \(y(t) = R\sin(\omega t)\), and \(z(t) = v_0t\). Find the curvature and torsion curve.
http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/7828/gwi.png

We can then parameterize the helix
\begin{align*}
x(t) &= R\cos(\omega t)\\
y(t) &= R\sin(\omega t)\\
z(t) &= v_0t
\end{align*}
We have that
\begin{align*}
\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt} &= v\hat{\mathbf{u}}\\
\hat{\mathbf{u}} &= \frac{1}{v}\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt}\\
v\hat{\mathbf{u}} &= \frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt}\\
\lvert v\hat{\mathbf{u}}\rvert &= \left\lvert\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt}\right\rvert\\
v &= \left\lvert\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt}\right\rvert
\end{align*}
From our parameterization, we have that \(\mathbf{r}(t) = R\cos(\omega t)\hat{\mathbf{i}} + R\sin(\omega t)\hat{\mathbf{j}} +
v_0t\hat{\mathbf{k}}\).
Therefore,
\begin{align*}
\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt} &= -R\omega\sin(\omega t)\hat{\mathbf{i}} +
R\omega\cos(\omega t)\hat{\mathbf{j}} + v_0\hat{\mathbf{k}}\\
\left\lvert\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt}\right\rvert
&= \sqrt{R^2\omega^2 + v_0^2}\\
v &= \sqrt{R^2\omega^2 + v_0^2}
\end{align*}
So our unit vector \(\hat{\mathbf{u}}\) can be written as
\begin{align*}
\hat{\mathbf{u}} &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{R^2\omega^2 + v_0^2}}
\langle -R\omega\sin(\omega t), R\omega\cos(\omega t), v_0\rangle.
\end{align*}
Since \(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} = \frac{1}{\rho}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\),
\(\left\lvert\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} \right\rvert = \frac{1}{\rho}\).
Using the fact that \(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} = \frac{1}{v}\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{dt}\), we can now write
\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{\rho} &= \left\lvert\frac{1}{v}\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{dt}\right\rvert
\end{align*}
Let's take the time derivative of \(\hat{\mathbf{u}}\).
\begin{alignat*}{2}
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{dt} &= \frac{R\omega^2}{\sqrt{R^2\omega^2 + v_0^2}}\langle
-\cos(\omega t), -\sin(\omega t), 0\rangle\\
\frac{1}{\rho} &= \frac{R\omega^2}{R^2\omega^2 + v_0^2} &&
\left(\text{curvature}\right)
\end{alignat*}
Now, let's look at \(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds} = -\frac{1}{\tau}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\).
Then \(\left\lvert \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds} \right\rvert = \frac{1}{\tau}\).

I am not sure what I can say about \(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds}\)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, you can write that
$$\tau=-\mathbf{n} \cdot \frac{d \mathbf{b}}{ds},$$
where $\mathbf{b} := \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n}$. So here, I'm using $\mathbf{n}$ as the principal normal vector, $\mathbf{t}$ as the unit tangent vector, and $\mathbf{b}$ as the binormal vector. Can you compute $\mathbf{t}, \mathbf{n},$ and $\mathbf{b}$ in terms of arc length?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top