Curvature form respect to principal connection

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on computing the curvature form with respect to a principal connection in the context of principal bundles. The user defines curvature as an operator D: Ω^k(P,g) → Ω_{Hor}^{k+1}(P,g) and provides the formula Dθ(X_1, X_2, ..., X_{k+1}) = dθ(X_1^{Hor}, X_2^{Hor}, ..., X_{k+1}^{Hor}). The user seeks assistance in completing the computation, particularly when θ is a zero form valued in the Lie algebra. The final result is expressed as Dη = dη + ω ∧ η - (-1)^{deg η} η ∧ ω, indicating the relationship between the exterior differential and the principal connection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of principal bundles and their structure
  • Familiarity with differential forms and exterior derivatives
  • Knowledge of Lie algebras and their representations
  • Concept of horizontal and vertical vectors in the context of connections
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of principal connections in differential geometry
  • Learn about the computation of curvature forms in principal bundles
  • Explore the relationship between differential forms and Lie algebras
  • Investigate the applications of curvature in gauge theory and physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, theoretical physicists, and researchers in differential geometry who are working with principal bundles and connections, particularly those interested in curvature forms and their applications.

Simon_G
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Curvature form with respect to principal connection

Hi all,

I have a question. Let us suppose that P is a principal bundle with G standard group, \omega a principal connection (as a split of tangent space in direct sum of vertical and horizontal vectors, at every point in a differential way) and \theta \in \Omega^k(P,g) a k-form valued in the lie algebra (g is lie algebra of G). I tried to compute curvature of \theta with respect to \omega but I'm already stuck.

By definition, curvature is a operator D:\Omega^k(P,g) \to \Omega_{Hor}^{k+1}(P,g):D\theta (X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_{k+1}):= d\theta (X_1^{Hor}, X_2^{Hor}, \ldots, X_{k+1}^{Hor})

where d is external differential of k-form and X_j^{Hor} is horizontal part of X_j with respect to principal connection.

So, in the simplest case, we take \theta a zero form valued in the lie algebra (i.e. a function). If we compute the curvature we must take the exterior differential: d\theta(x,e) = \partial_\mu \theta dx^\mu + \partial_a \theta de^a where (x^\mu;e^a) are local fibered coordinates.

Obviously, in the same fibered coordinate, principal connection is in the form:

\omega = dx^\mu \otimes (\partial_\mu - \omega^A_\mu (x) \rho_A)

and X_j^{Hor} := \omega(X_j)

where \partial_\mu = \frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu} and \rho_A is a basis of local right invariant vector.

Ok, could you give me a hint to complete the result?

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Simon_G said:
D:\Omega^k(P,g) \to \Omega_{Hor}^{k+1}(P,g):D\theta (X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_{k+1}):= d\theta (X_1^{Hor}, X_2^{Hor}, \ldots, X_{k+1}^{Hor})

and X_j^{Hor} := \omega(X_j)

It seems that these two facts are sufficient to give you the answer. Did you want to write the answer another way?

I'm afraid I'm not very familiar with the "horizontal vs. vertical" way of thinking of principal connections, so I can only tell you what the result is:

D \eta = d \eta + \omega \wedge \eta - (-1)^{\mathrm{deg} \; \eta} \, \eta \wedge \omega
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K