Undergrad Curvature Index in Flat Universe with Cosmological Constant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ranku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature Index
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The curvature index κ in a flat universe with a cosmological constant is definitively zero. In a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker-Lemaitre universe, if the density relative to critical density satisfies the equation 1 = Ω = Ω_r + Ω_m + Ω_Λ, then κ equals zero, indicating flat spatial curvature. The total mass/energy density of the universe is expressed as ρ_total = ρ_m + ρ_r + ρ_Λ, with critical density defined as ρ_crit = 3H²/(8πG). If ρ_total equals ρ_crit, the universe is flat.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Friedmann-Robertson-Walker-Lemaitre cosmology
  • Knowledge of critical density and its implications
  • Familiarity with cosmological constants and their role in universe dynamics
  • Basic grasp of energy density equations in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of critical density in cosmological models
  • Explore the role of the cosmological constant in universe expansion
  • Study the Friedmann equations and their applications in cosmology
  • Investigate the relationship between energy density and curvature in different universe models
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the dynamics of the universe and the implications of curvature and energy density in cosmological models.

Ranku
Messages
434
Reaction score
18
Is the curvature index κ necessarily zero in a flat universe with cosmological constant?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Ranku said:
Is the curvature index κ necessarily zero in a flat universe with cosmological constant?
Yes. If a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker-Lemaitre universes has density (relative to critical density) ##1 = \Omega = \Omega_r + \Omega_r +\Omega_\Lambda##, then it is flat and ##\kappa = 0##. ("Flat" refers to spatial curvature (of 3-dimensional hypersurfaces), not to spacetime curvature.)
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes PeterDonis, Ranku and timmdeeg
George Jones said:
Yes. If a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker-Lemaitre universes has density (relative to critical density) ##1 = \Omega = \Omega_r + \Omega_r +\Omega_\Lambda##, then it is flat and ##\kappa = 0##. ("Flat" refers to spatial curvature (of 3-dimensional hypersurfaces), not to spacetime curvature.)
To extend the discussion, the curvature index ##\kappa## can also cast in terms of its energy density
##\rho####\kappa#### =- \frac{3k}{8πGa^2}##. Can we identify the 'source' of ##\rho####\kappa##? Is it the matter density in the universe?
 
Ranku said:
To extend the discussion, the curvature index ##\kappa## can also cast in terms of its energy density
##\rho####\kappa#### =- \frac{3k}{8πGa^2}##. Can we identify the 'source' of ##\rho####\kappa##? Is it the matter density in the universe?
No.

The total mass/energy density of the universe ##\rho_{total} = \rho_m + \rho_r + \rho_\Lambda##, where ##\rho_m## is the density of matter, ##\rho_r## is the density of radiation, ##\rho_\Lambda## is the density of the vacuum.

Critical density ##\rho_{crit}## is defined by
$$\rho_{crit} := \frac{3H^2}{8\pi G}.$$
If ##\rho_{total} < \rho_{crit}## then the universe is open with negative spatial curvature, if ##\rho_{total} = \rho_{crit}## then the universe is open and flat (zero spatial curvature), and If ##\rho_{total} > \rho_{crit}## then the universe is closed with positive spatial curvature. Note that I have not said anything about whether the universe expands forever or recollapses.

Now define ##\rho_\kappa## by ##\rho_\kappa := \rho_{crit} -\rho_{total}##. This is just a definition, not a physical density, Sean Carroll writes "don't forget this just notational sleight of hand."
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, Ranku and PeterDonis
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K