Custom made Lagragian and Help Wanted

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jfy4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagragian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the formulation of Lagrange's equations of motion using a custom Lagrangian defined as \(\mathcal{L}(\dot{\psi},\psi)=\sqrt{\langle \dot{\psi}_b|C^{\dagger}_bC_a|\dot{\psi}_a\rangle}\). The user is attempting to derive the equation \(-\frac{d}{d\tau}\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\dot{\psi}_a}=0\) and has made progress in simplifying the expression. The conversation highlights the interpretation of the Lagrangian as a square root of a quadratic form and discusses the integration by parts technique applied to the derived equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics notation (bra-ket notation)
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly partial derivatives and integration by parts
  • Experience with operator algebra in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lagrange's equations in classical mechanics
  • Learn about the application of integration by parts in variational calculus
  • Explore the implications of using quantum mechanical operators in classical Lagrangian formulations
  • Research the mathematical properties of quadratic forms in the context of Lagrangians
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students interested in advanced mechanics, particularly those working with Lagrangian formulations and quantum mechanics concepts.

jfy4
Messages
645
Reaction score
3
Hi Everyone,

I'm interested in forming Lagrange's equations of motion using a Lagrangian I made up today. It looks like this:
[tex]\mathcal{L}(\dot{\psi},\psi)=\sqrt{\langle \dot{\psi}_b|C^{\dagger}_bC_a|\dot{\psi}_a\rangle}[/tex]

where [tex]C^{\dagger}_b[/tex] is a creation operator for a basis [tex]b[/tex] etc... and a dot represents a full derivative with respect to some parametrization [tex]\tau[/tex].

Now there is no [tex]\psi[/tex] dependence so I believe I am only interested in this part:
[tex]-\frac{d}{d\tau}\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\dot{\psi}_a}=0[/tex]

I have gotten this far:
[tex]-\frac{d}{d\tau}\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\dot{\psi}_a}=-\frac{d}{d\tau}\left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\mathcal{L}}\left(\int \partial_{\dot{\psi}_a}\dot{\psi}_{b}^{\ast}C^{\dagger}_bC_a\dot{\psi}_a d\tau + \int \dot{\psi}_{b}^{\ast}\partial_{\dot{\psi}_a}(C^{\dagger}_bC_a)\dot{\psi}_a d\tau + \int \dot{\psi}_{b}^{\ast}C^{\dagger}_bC_a\partial_{\dot{\psi}_a}\dot{\psi}_a d\tau\right)\right)=0.[/tex]

The first partial turns to 0 i think, the second partial I'm not sure how to interpret, but I think it's zero too because of no [tex]\dot{\psi}_a[/tex] dependence and the last partial I believe is 1. Anyone got a comment on accuracy or how to clean it up any better?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not clear from your notation what [itex]\mathcal{L}(\dot{\psi},\psi)=\sqrt{\langle \dot{\psi}_b|C^{\dagger}_bC_a|\dot{\psi}_a\rangle}[/itex] means. Are we to interpret the Lagrangian as being the square-root of some quadratic form of your dynamical variables [itex]\psi[/itex]? Typically, the bra and ket notations are reserved for quantum mechanics; not classical lagrangian mechanics.
 
Yes, I had in mind the scalar product between those two vectors with the square root. After turning the first two partials to zero, I made this progress with the last integral. I integrated by parts:

[tex]\int\dot{\psi}_{b}^{\ast}C_{b}^{\dagger}C_a d\tau=\psi_{b}^{\ast}C_{b}^{\dagger}C_a-\int \psi_{b}^{\ast}\frac{d}{d\tau}(C_{b}^{\dagger}C_a) d\tau=\psi_{b}^{\ast}C_{b}^{\dagger}C_a-\int \psi_{b}^{\ast}\frac{dC_{b}^{\dagger}}{d\tau}C_a d\tau-\int \psi_{b}^{\ast}C_{b}^{\dagger}\frac{dC_a}{d\tau} d\tau[/tex]

any other suggestions?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K