d-orbital self split or proton split d-orbitals?

AI Thread Summary
D-orbitals do not split themselves in the absence of ligands due to the nature of electron interactions and the influence of external electric fields. The concept of d-orbital splitting is primarily attributed to the presence of ligands, which create an electric field that interacts with the d-orbitals, leading to energy differences among them. The discussion highlights that while electrons are indistinguishable, it is the spatial arrangement and the presence of ligands that cause the splitting, not the inherent properties of the d-orbitals themselves. The role of protons from ligands is also questioned, with the consensus leaning towards the idea that it is the lone pairs of electrons from ligands that primarily influence the d-orbital splitting energy. References to support these points can be found in advanced inorganic chemistry textbooks and scholarly articles on crystal field theory and ligand field theory.
adf89812
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
why don't d-orbitals split themselves, why does it take a ligand? why can't proton split d-orbital?
why don't d-orbitals split themselves because of themselves without the presence of ligands? Electrons are indistinguishable. Why wouldn't it be more correct that protons from a ligand split the d-orbitals rather than the lone-pairs cause d-orbital splitting energy?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
adf89812 said:
why don't d-orbitals split themselves because of themselves without the presence of ligands? Electrons are indistinguishable. Why wouldn't it be more correct that protons from a ligand split the d-orbitals rather than the lone-pairs cause d-orbital splitting energy?
Do you have a reference for where you are getting all this from?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top