D0-> K+ K- Decay Suppression - A Puzzling Question

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter milch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    decay
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The decay process $$D^0 \rightarrow K^+ K^-$$ is suppressed due to Cabibbo suppression, which occurs when a W boson couples quarks from different generations. In this case, the charm quark couples with a strange quark, leading to the production of an up quark and an anti-strange quark, resulting in the K mesons. This decay is not rare but is less frequent compared to the decay $$D^0 \rightarrow K^- \pi^+$$. The suppression applies universally to any quark coupling involving different generations, confirming that the Cabibbo suppression is a fundamental aspect of particle interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and particle interactions
  • Knowledge of quark generations and the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Familiarity with Cabibbo suppression and its implications
  • Basic concepts of W boson interactions in particle decay
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Cabibbo suppression in various decay processes
  • Explore the role of Feynman diagrams in predicting particle interactions
  • Learn about the differences between quark generations in the Standard Model
  • Investigate the effects of W boson couplings on particle decay rates
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the dynamics of particle decay processes.

milch
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey community!

Since a couple of hours I've been dealing with the question why the decay $$D^0 \rightarrow K^+ K^-$$ is suppressed.
If I draw the Feynman diagram for the first order decay, everything seems pretty alright as the charm quark can couple with a strange quark. The resulting W+ can then produce an up and anti-strange quark which gives above K mesons.
What piece am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
up and anti-strange are two different generations, there you get the Cabibbo suppression (compared to ##D^0 \rightarrow K^- \pi^+##).

It is not a rare decay. It's just not as frequent as the decay to ##K^- \pi^+##.
 
Aaah, somehow I thought the Cabibbo suppression just applies in case of a quark-quark decay. But it holds whenever any kind of quark coupling is involved (independent of the "direction" I go in the diagram), right? (Sorry in advance for these basic questions..)
 
Correct, whenever you have a coupling of a W with quarks belonging to different generations, you get a suppression (an even larger suppression if the generations are 1,3 or 2,3).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K