MHB Dale Simpson's question at Yahoo Answers (One-to-one matrix)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

recall a matrix A is one-to-one if for vectors x and y, Ax = Ay implies that x = y. Suppose A is a
matrix with columns v1, v2, . . . vk. Prove if any linear combination of the form
a1*v1 + a2*v2 + : : : + ak*vk = 0;
has only the trivial solution, then A is one-to-one.

Here is a link to the question:

Prove a matrix is one to one? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Dale,

Suppose that $A$ (order $m\times k$) is not one-to-one, then there exist vectors $x=(x_1,\ldots,x_k)^t$ and $y=(y_1,\ldots,y_k)^t$ such that $Ax=Ay$ with $x\neq y$. Equivalently, $A(x-y)=0$ with $x\neq y$. We have $x_i-y_i\neq 0$ for some $i$. Then, $$\begin{aligned}&A\begin{bmatrix}x_1-y_1\\ \vdots\\{x_i-y_i}\\ \vdots\\x_k-y_k\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}{v_1}&{\ldots}&{v_k}\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x_1-y_1\\ \vdots\\{x_i-y_i}\\ \vdots\\x_k-y_k\end{bmatrix}\\&=(x_1-y_1)v_1+\ldots+(x_i-y_i)v_i+\ldots+(x_k-y_k)v_k=0\end{aligned}$$ This implies that not all linear combination $a_1v_1+\ldots+a_kv_k=0$ has only the trivial solution (contradiction).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top