Dale Simpson's question at Yahoo Answers (One-to-one matrix)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a matrix A is one-to-one if any linear combination of its columns results in the trivial solution only. Specifically, if the equation a1*v1 + a2*v2 + ... + ak*vk = 0 has only the trivial solution, then A must be one-to-one. The proof involves demonstrating that if A is not one-to-one, it leads to a contradiction by showing that a non-trivial linear combination can equal zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically one-to-one matrices.
  • Familiarity with matrix operations and linear combinations.
  • Knowledge of vector spaces and their properties.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and contradiction techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of one-to-one and onto functions in linear algebra.
  • Learn about the rank-nullity theorem and its implications for linear transformations.
  • Explore the concept of linear independence and its relation to matrix columns.
  • Investigate the implications of matrix dimensions on one-to-one mappings.
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of matrix theory and linear transformations.

Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

recall a matrix A is one-to-one if for vectors x and y, Ax = Ay implies that x = y. Suppose A is a
matrix with columns v1, v2, . . . vk. Prove if any linear combination of the form
a1*v1 + a2*v2 + : : : + ak*vk = 0;
has only the trivial solution, then A is one-to-one.

Here is a link to the question:

Prove a matrix is one to one? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Dale,

Suppose that $A$ (order $m\times k$) is not one-to-one, then there exist vectors $x=(x_1,\ldots,x_k)^t$ and $y=(y_1,\ldots,y_k)^t$ such that $Ax=Ay$ with $x\neq y$. Equivalently, $A(x-y)=0$ with $x\neq y$. We have $x_i-y_i\neq 0$ for some $i$. Then, $$\begin{aligned}&A\begin{bmatrix}x_1-y_1\\ \vdots\\{x_i-y_i}\\ \vdots\\x_k-y_k\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}{v_1}&{\ldots}&{v_k}\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x_1-y_1\\ \vdots\\{x_i-y_i}\\ \vdots\\x_k-y_k\end{bmatrix}\\&=(x_1-y_1)v_1+\ldots+(x_i-y_i)v_i+\ldots+(x_k-y_k)v_k=0\end{aligned}$$ This implies that not all linear combination $a_1v_1+\ldots+a_kv_k=0$ has only the trivial solution (contradiction).
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K